Saturday, April 18, 2026

The Liar, The Witchdoctor and the Warroom

 


"Humankind cannot bear very much reality."

T.S. Eliot

"You have to understand, we are just at the beginning of this thing. What we tell you this week is  based on the best available information we have right now. But six weeks from now, with new information, we may be saying something entirely different. That's science. That's the way it works."

--Dr. Rich Conit, podcast "This Week in Virology" 2020, speaking of the COVID pandemic.


                             Banting & Best & dog

I was going to title this blog post, "Of Snake Oil, Hulk Hogan and Brain Worm," but the chance to echo C.S. Lewis prevailed. 

Listening to Pete Hegseth unwittingly quoting "Pulp Fiction," and presenting it as Ezekiel 25:17, using scripture to establish his war cred, I thought, what could be more illuminating?

Seeking authority often entails claiming to possess the Truth, to have true knowledge. There are several ways to come by knowledge:

1. You can do the hard work of science: observation, record keeping, tabulation and publication so others can try to disprove or corroborate what you say is true. But this is a tedious, laborious and demanding process.

2. You can refer to a written text, something like the Bible. How often have we heard someone, caressing the Good Book, worn by use, saying, "All the answers are right here, right here in this book."  The advantage of quoting the Bible is there is a nifty sounding verse, "Ezekiel: 25:17" which nobody will have time to look up, until the advent of  Google, and even after that, there often isn't time, so you can sound erudite with pretty little effort.

3. You can just pretend, play a role, as actors do. This is the path chosen by Bobby Kennedy, Jr., as he refers to some article from the medical literature, as if he has actually read and understood the whole thing, and then he can conclude that more people were harmed by the polio vaccine than were ever saved by it, or that 75% of people given a vaccine were harmed by it.

The thing about science is, unlike "reading the law," you cannot really do it on your own. This is why doctors have "journal clubs" where they read articles from The New England Journal of Medicine, and various specialists will give you the background of why an article was written, how the research was done and what the problems really are with the conclusions. RFKJR does not go to these journal clubs. He just scans articles for sentences which might be construed to support the firmly held convictions he brings to the article and he goes from there. He is "doing his own research," which means, he really isn't reading for understanding; he is scanning for cherry-picked sound bites.

Virtually no scientists doing important and reliable research do their own research; they all operate in a community and they are rivals, teammates and in constant communication.



 

Anti-vaxers have been particularly animated by RFKJR, but resistance to the whole idea of vaccination has a long history.  The forerunner of vaccines, was inoculation, where a small dose of a virus (or material from a small pox pustule) was injected, and a mild case of smallpox ensued, but it wasn't always mild. The idea of giving a healthy person a disease to prevent a worse disease was a hard sell in the eighteenth century, and Cotton Mather, a cleric and Dr. Zabdiel Bolyston, a Boston physician, met agitated resistance: A bomb was thrown into Mather's home, because he advocated for smallpox inoculation.

Fear the Smallpox


It came down to the question: Which are you more afraid of: the disease or the medicine?

Small Pox 


When I was a medical resident, I saw what influenza could do. Sometime around midnight, we admitted a 21 year old woman to our intensive care unit at New York Hospital--she was a dusky blue color, in and out of lucidity, and her blood oxygen level was incompatible with life. She died in three hours, despite our efforts. I presented her story to every conference, every doctor I could, trying to figure out what I could have done to save her, but failed to do. Most of the older doctors, who had seen the last influenza epidemic decades before, simply shook their heads and said, "That's what influenza can do." 

When I saw her lungs, at autopsy, I understood why we had failed to raise her blood oxygen level: they had turned into the consistency of the liver you'd buy at a butcher's--normal lungs are spongey, full of spaces for air to be captured. She could not move any air through her lungs to her bloodstream. 

Years later, now in private practice in the real world outside the hospital, I urged all my patients to get their annual influenza vaccine. One of them, a fifty-two year old woman, developed Guillain-Barre syndrome following her vaccine and she had to be hospitalize for the polio like syndrome. She fell out of her wheel chair in the hospital and broke a hip. When she finally got home, I stopped by to see her, expecting to incur her wrath or the rebuke from her husband, but they were forgiving and pleasant. 

"It's a risk of the vaccine," she said. "I knew that."

"I don't think I ever mentioned it to you," I told her. "But, if I had, I would have still urged you to get the vaccine. Guillain-Barre just so rare. You were just the lucky one."

"I know. Of course, I'll never get another flu vaccine."

The risk of something comes down to numbers, to record keeping, to a lot of meticulous, boring, hard work and people who fear and vilify vaccines don't want to do all that. They just want to know, without doing the work.

Science is often a slog. 

Before anyone knew about insulin, children with type 1 diabetes were treated with a diet by Elliot Joslin in Boston. He reasoned that because these children were known to have very high blood sugars if you denied them any sugar--or anything in their diet which could be transformed into sugar--you could control their blood sugar. Some children seemed to live a little longer, but they looked like living skeletons and they died anyway.

Then, one summer in Toronto, an irascible former Army surgeon, Frederick Banting, and a PhD student, Charles Best, spent the summer of 1921 chasing down a phantom agent in dog pancreases, dissecting out the pancreases, tying off the pancreatic ducts in their dog victims/patients and inducing diabetes in them, showing the pancreas was the source of something which prevented diabetes, and then they more or less isolated that something, which they called "insulin."  It was tedious, frustrating, demanding work, done in a steaming laboratory of a hot Toronto summer, but when they finally had enough data and had gone through enough dogs, they presented their findings to a conference of doctors in New Haven, and Elliott Joslin listened, asked questions and then beamed. You have made my diet a relic. Now we have a new understanding and a new approach which will finally work. 


Before and After Insulin 1922


That's science.

RFKJR never worked that hard at anything. He's never done anything like Banting and Best beyond dissecting out a racoon penis from a road kill raccoon, and calling that science.

For centuries, the Bubonic Plague had ravaged Europe, laying waste to whole populations, sometimes cutting down half of all living human beings, and there were lots of "doctors" and priests who wandered around wearing beaks and carrying whips, the RFKJR's of their day.





Then, Alexandre Yersin, who had trained in Louis Pasteur's laboratory, who knew the techniques for growing bacteria in the laboratory, and he headed off to Hong Kong from his clinic in Vietnam and he managed to capture, identify and raise antisera to the bacterial agent, Yersinia pestis, and when Plague made its way to Vietnam he saved the villagers surrounding his clinic. That was a lot of dangerous, demanding hard work, but he did it.

Alexandre Yersin

 

RFKJR has never done anything like that.

The thing about science is it has to happen in the real world, not in fantasyland. In fact, a lot of science is simply an effort to understand what is real, and what is not.

It requires creative thought, innovation, but it usually also requires building upon what has been done before you, and using that to understand new stuff.

Ask any middle school kid at Hampton Academy who Banting and Best were or who Alexander Yersin was, or how type 1 diabetes got tamed, or how the plague got controlled and you will get nothing but blank looks. They can tell you who George Washington was, or Robert E. Lee reliably enough, but have they ever heard of Jonas Salk and the polio vaccine story or about small pox vaccines or how observations about milk maids with cowpox led to the small pox vaccination? 

We just don't teach that stuff to Americans.

The New York Times reports that over 3 dozen American physicians and nurses are running for Congress, mostly running against RFKJR. Of course, 40 years ago that could never have happened, because 40 years ago most doctors were in private practice and they could not afford closing their businesses to run for Congress. Now 90% of physicians work for corporations, they are hired employees paid by large corporate entities to be "providers."  A pediatrician leaving a job with Partners paying $90,000 a year is not a wrenching financial decision.

There have been physicians in Congress, of course, but most were more like Dr. Bill Frist, whose father started the for profit Hospital Corporation of America in Nashville, and when Dr. Frist left the Senate, he did not return to doing transplant surgery; he started a corporation to provide health care. Dr. Frist was frustrated in the U.S. Senate because, unlike in the operating room, he could not just  give orders. He found himself having to deal with 99 other Senators who often disagreed with him.

None of those health care providers, if they do win their seats in Congress, will be able to do what RFKJR has done to American health care as a cabinet Secretary. RFKJR has single handedly destroyed the CDC, the FDA, and a host of other lesser known agencies which once did good works for America, and never mind what he's done to the National Institutes of Health or to the thousands of universities where research funded by the NIH was doing good work until RFKJR acted fast and broke things, to the delight of the MAGAmob. 



So we have RFKJR, who more Americans can name, recognize and even quote than there are Americans who can identify Banting and Best, Yersin, Jenner, Salk or any of dozens of scientists and doctors who have made far more difference in their lives, the way they live their lives every day than any general or President ever has.



Tuesday, April 14, 2026

The Truth About Truth

 


Here are some things which are True:

1/ Alex Pretti is still dead.

2/ Renee Good is still dead.

3/ Neither one of them should be dead, and neither was either a terrorist nor dangerous.

These things are pretty clearly, "self evident," truths.



Another truth:

4/ Jeffrey Epstein is still dead.

And here's something which is neither true nor false: Does anyone really believe Jeffrey Epstein was not murdered?

We have been lied to about his "suicide." And we all know it, but we move on. 

Government lies. 

What else is new?



If Kristi Noem had said Epstein was a terrorist, who was a danger to American citizens, then we could be sure Epstein was murdered, but she never has said that. Neither has Pam Bondi, and Bondi might even know.

Without going into the weeds: What's with all that missing video monitoring of Epstein's cell?  Every time you see that on a Netflix police procedural, you know something's not right. Does life not imitate art?


                            He's lying about being a tough guy. 

And here is a litmus test for whether you are about to be lied to:

1/ Ask your guest who won the 2020 Presidential election. 

If you get a dance--"Well, Joseph Biden was declared the winner," or "Joseph Biden was sworn in as President," then you are dealing with a liar. It would be generous to say you are dealing with a person who is so much a member of the cult, like a member of that Jim Jones cult who drank poison KoolAid they were so under the spell of Jones, or, in this case MAGA, that when they deny Biden won, they are not lying, but simply under a spell. 

Drinking the Kool Aid: Google Jonestown


But the dance is a lie. If they say, "I believe Donald Trump won, and the election was stolen," then they are not lying, but people like Pam Bondi, Kristi Noem and John Wayne Mullin all did the evasion dance, "Well, Joe Biden was proclaimed the winner," wink, wink. They are trying to evade the question which is, "Are you a cult, true believer or not?"

Cult Members in Jonestown who drank the Kool Aid


2/ Ask, "How do you know Iran is building a nuclear weapon?"  Anything other than, "We cannot know for sure, but if there's any chance, then  I'd bomb them back to the Stone Age," then you are being lied to.

He lied about being the Second Coming


3/ Do you believe Donald Trump was lying when he said he was not picturing himself as the Second Coming of Christ with his Truth Social posting or do you think he was simply showing himself as a physician, which is what he says he meant?  If you see the dance, they are lying either to you and/or to themselves, but either way they are lying.

He lied about being disabled for the draft


Lying in politics is as endemic as lying about sex.

When Bill Clinton was caught in a lie about having sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky, the reaction, especially among Black Americans was, "Everyone lies about sex."

As Chris Rock has noted so eloquently, we don't even expect people to tell the truth about sex. We expect them to lie.



Somehow this expectation is likely what dogs Trump about Jeffrey Epstein. You know he's lying, but his MAGA mob forgives lies about sex. We are all sinners.

But, the Epstein thing, under-aged girls, private islands, somehow has a life outside normal manners.


The other thing about Epstein, of all the million words now public, the one thing which sticks in Mad Dog's craw is that note from Trump to Epstein, "And may every day be another wonderful secret." Mad Dog is sorry, but that sounds like a lover's refrain. Nobody Mad Dog has ever mentioned this to has agreed, but Mad Dog thinks if Jeffry Epstein and Trump were gay lovers, then a lot of other things would make sense.



Just saying, as we say in New Hampshire.

Here are a few things we've been lied to about:

1/ The American government lied about overthrowing the Panamanian narco President, Noriega. He was on the payroll of the US government until he became inconvenient. The government lied about him.

2/ Ditto for the Contras, who were on the US payroll and who the US government lied about, with respect to Nicaragua. 

In fact, the U.S. government's only interest in the Caribbean has been the United Fruit company, not any of the island people who grow their products.

3/ The U.S. government arranged for the overthrow of a democratically elected President in Chile, Allende, and funded his execution, as it did with the U.S. puppet in Vietnam, Dieu, and the US government lied about that.

So lying about our nefarious, deadly and undemocratic deeds overseas is like lying about sex: It's expected. Nobody believes or expects to believe our government about stuff that happens outside our borders, like say, in Guantanamo. 

And now the US government lies about what happens inside our borders.

The government lied about the murder of Renee Good, who was not trying to run over a DEA agent with her car.

The government lied about who would benefit from any of Trump's beautiful bills to give away trillions to billionaires.

Trump lied about having a plan, or more precisely the concept of a plan, for healthcare and replacing Obamacare, which Trump lied about saying Obamacare was a disaster, when in fact it was a good thing.



Trump lies about windmills, which are no threat to global bird life or whales. Why he lies about this is unclear. Some people lie about things they don't have to lie about. Some people think he's lying to please the Koch brothers who want oil to be the only option for energy in the US. 

Trump lies about solar power being a bad thing. Even if he believes what he says about solar power, saying it raises energy costs or it is unreliable, he is being willfully wrong, which is the same as lying when it comes right down to it. If you know you are wrong and you simply do not want to hear the truth, then you are lying when you persist in being wrong.

The thing about lying is it is a cousin to fantasy. 

They are not actually fighting. They are acting.


Take professional wrestling: It's clearly not meant to be believed--the stories of the various figures in the ring, the "fights" themselves. Its just a sort of boys' fantasy camp, but the arenas are filled with people delighted, screaming and enjoying the show. Trump spent years promoting professional wrestling, living in that fantasyland.


Fake wresting

Real Wrestling, Not faked


That's where we are now with Trump and Hegseth and Miller and that smarmy Scott Bessent. They are all stomping around the ring, play acting, roaring like Hulk Hogan, having a good time, and the 40% are out there in the cheap seats roaring with delight.

They love the lie.


That's Not Really Him. He doesn't look like this.


It's fun.

It's just not true.





Monday, April 13, 2026

Amazing Grace: Our Savior is Risen in Donald John Trump

 


Our father, who art in Heaven, has apparently, finally sent the Second Coming of his Son back down to earth, and if 37% of Americans have their way, it will be the End of Times, the Rapture, not just the end of a trivial 2,000 year old Persian civilization, but the saving of all mankind, as Donald John Trump has done risen.



And, Mad Dog notes, it was not the Catholic Church which is responsible, as all his Ku Klux Klan friends have always warned him, but the evangelical Protestants, while the soft-on-crime Catholics, who soured on crucifixions because they thought that punishment barbaric, while Mr. Trump quickly grasped that real men dealt with their enemies with nails through the hands and feet, or dumps of excrement from the heavens. 

How could Mad Dog have been so blind?



But now he sees.

And will Donald the John save a wretch like thee?

                               Prophet of Peace

One can only hope, and if you have faith, you will be rewarded with riches beyond calculation, maybe with Bitcoin, maybe not. We'll have to see. In two, maybe three weeks, but you really should buy the Trump Bible for only $99.99. (If you act now, he'll throw in a few Trump steaks.) And really, this Bible is just so beautiful, but you better get yours fast, because, you know, time is running out. And in fact, it's the end of times, coming soon. 




For the savior is among us, and he's sent his angels to the Strait of Hormuz.

Grace will teach their hearts to fear, how precious does that grace now appear.

We were lost in Biden and Obama and on the ground.

Were lost but now we're found.

Were blind, but now we see.

And as John, for whom Donald is partially named, has said, "Then you will know the Truth. And the Truth shall set you free."

Ay-man to that. (Not Ah-men, as the Catholics say, but the true Ay-[rhymes with hay]man.)





Thursday, April 9, 2026

Conventional Wisdom

 


The bombing of civilian infrastructure, bridges, power plants is a "war crime."



Pythons in Florida swamps and Norwegian maple trees in New Hampshire are "invasive species."

Colonizing the moon and Mars are an expression of the human spirit of exploration and represents a grand vision for the future of humanity which visionaries like Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos will bring us.

We want workplaces, universities and clubs to "look like America."

Mad Dog hears these things and they make his head spin, his stomach growl and his fingers itch. These are articles of faith, such deeply engrained conventional podcast wisdom nobody even questions them any more, or, well, not "nobody" but too few people question them. We don't groan or cry out--we just let these things sail by as not worth challenging because so many people just nod and say, "Yeah, we know all that."



WAR CRIMES

The "war crime" thing is usually followed by some mention of the "Geneva Convention." As Mad Dog understands it, after World War II, a number of nations signed a treaty to prevent behavior by nations such as bombing civilian populations, destroying water supplies, torturing prisoners, exacting collective punishment for the crimes of a few terrorists--things for which the Allies executed Hitler's minions and generals, what Goering called, "victors' justice," meaning none of these things would be considered immoral or criminal if the Nazis had won the war by doing these things. 

The answer to "war crimes" is that life on earth was ever so, brutal, ruthless and selfish, and people who try to prettify, restrain or pretend we can wage war like gentlemen are ridiculous fools who think war ought to be fought with chivalry by gallant warriors. 

The only reason poison gas was not used during WWII was the fear if you used it, the other side would use it, and that fear, shared by both sides, worked unreasonably well. The first instance of mutually assured destruction.

Of course, the Americans  fire bombed Japanese cities relentlessly, targeting civilians, setting afire "non combatant" people, homes, factories, everything, even before Hiroshima. That was justified as a way of winning the war. 

But now, all that, which was once called "total war," is called immoral and "illegal." In reaction to that, in 1949 diplomats traipsed off to Geneva, and promised their countries would never do any of that again. They signed papers with ink. But, of course, by 1965, none of that mattered, as the United States tried to bomb Vietnam back to the Stone Age, mined harbors and set villages afire with napalm.

If there is nobody to enforce a law, is there a law?

If a tree falls in a forest and no ear to hear it, is there a sound?

Pete Hegseth argues we are fools to talk about rules of engagement and he joins Sylvester Stallone and Rambo saying we would have won in Vietnam if only those prissy generals had allowed us to fight with both hands rather than one tied behind our back. It was the American version of the Hitler thing about our indominable armies having been stabbed in the back by their own politicians and undesirable elements.





But nobody ever called any of this Vietnam behavior "war crimes," because these acts were committed by Americans, and even the My Lai massacre of infants and mothers, where photos were undeniable in the age before AI, none of the soldiers or officers who shot infants in the head were convicted--save the infamous Lt. Calley, who served three years of house arrest and then released.

Oh, well. Boys will be boys.

The fact is, when you unleash the dogs of war, they are going to go for the jugular, as the good citizens of Minneapolis discovered. Put guns in the hands of low grade psychopaths and sadists and bad things are going to happen, but that's not a "war crime."

Oh, well, boys will be boys and anyone they kill is a terrorist.


Renee Good


"Crime" means there is some authority to enforce transgressions, but when it's the authorities who are transgressing, there can be no crime. 

If a law is not enforced, it ceases to be a law.

"If the President does it, it's legal." Who said that? 

A/ Nixon? 

B/ Trump? 

C/ The Supreme Court?

 D/ All of the above?

No such thing as a war crime, because war itself is a crime against humanity. And we got no international police force, no international courts which are not a joke, or which have any power to enforce their decisions. Hell, we barely have a Supreme Court in the United States any more--just a bought and paid for rubber stamp for President Trump.



INVASIVE SPECIES

Then there is the concept of "invasive species." Trump would have you believe dark skinned immigrants are an invasive species, and when Mad Dog tried to buy a maroon leafed Norwegian maple, he was told they are illegal in New Hampshire because they are an "invasive species." 

Wrong leaf color. 

Never mind that you never see these trees growing wild in any wooded area in New Hampshire, but only as ornamental trees planted outside schools, parks or homes. 



If  you've taken introductory biology, you know that every species which has ever existed on the planet is an invasive species, seeking out a niche to occupy, out competing other plants or animals for resources, establishing its tenuous foothold in the great competition which is life on earth.



So when human beings say a tree or a fish is not "native" to some place, they mean they do not like that particular tree or fish, and it is crowding out other trees or fish they do like. 

It's a value judgment. 

It's true, some fish can be so successful, they obliterate other fish in the lake and so the lake has fewer varieties of fish, so if that successful fish, which is now the only species, ever succumbs to a virus or a change in temperature, the ecosystem is less diverse and a particular lake may find itself devoid of fish, until a new one arrives to occupy that niche. 

Feral pigs are causing widespread destruction in Texas, and clearly are invasive, as they are the descendants of pigs left off by Spanish explorers, and we do not like them one bit, so they are invasive. 

And don't get Mad Dog started on lampreys in the Great Lakes.



When the Charlotteville Unite the Right MAGA's chanted, "You Will Not Replace US," they were expressing this very sentiment--we are the good   [White] species, and a new, invasive species with Brown or Black skin speaking Spanish or Haitian will not replace us, because they are the  invasive species and we are the natives.


                           You Will Not Replace Us!

But, as George Carlin observed, every human being is an invader, is not native, except, perhaps for a few living in the Rift Valley of Africa, where homo sapiens may have emerged from apes, but everyone else spread out from there, walked or boated across Asia and on to the Bering Strait or down the West Coast of North America by boat, all the way to Patagonia. 

So "Native Americans" are not actually natives, no more "native" than the Europeans who exterminated them, pushed them off the continent using more advanced technology and a determination to end the nomadic hunter/gatherer way of live on the Great Plains, and replaced it with industrialized agriculture. It was a case of one group being better adapted to the environment, even changing the environment to displace another and occupying a niche.




So "Native Americans" is a misnomer and, in fact, if George Carlin is correct, "Indians" were not named by mistake because Columbus thought he had reached India, but because he thought them "Indus Deus," that is people of God, and so there is nothing disparaging about calling people "Indians."

Of course, Native Americans may prefer "Native Americans" because it sounds more entitled, but that's another story. 

Indians were outcompeted by an invasive species, namely the Europeans.


COLONIZING SPACE FOR HOMO SAPIENS

Then there is the idea of needing to colonize Mars or distant solar systems to ensure humankind survives the coming Armageddon.  Truth is, there is nothing within reach--not just within our own lifetimes, but for millions of years, even if we could use nuclear fusion to power our spacecraft and travel at nearly the speed of light (and you cannot go faster). 

But we do it because we are human beings and human beings are explorers and adventurers.




By the time we reach Alpha Centauri, the nearest star in another galaxy 100,000 earth years would have elapsed. To put that in perspective, dinosaurs roamed the earth until 66,000 years ago, so any earthling to reach this new solar system would wake up on his spacecraft and the people who sent him (us) would have gone the way of the dinosaurs back home. Certainly, your girlfriend back on earth would not remember you.



And nobody is going to farm potatoes on Mars, not now,  not ever. And if they did, they'd have no market for them either on Mars or back on earth. Love Matt Damon, but really, "The Martian" is actually just a fun movie, not a visionary manifesto.



LOOKING LIKE AMERICA

And finally, there is the idea that our colleges and work places should "look like America." Corporate CEO's say such stuff. So do deans of medical school admissions. As if looking like America, if we could even agree what that means, would be a desirable thing in a medical school class or in an architectural firm or in at a Ford dealership.





Really, why are looks so important? 

Aren't colleges, just to take one example, supposed to be about stuff which is not connected to visual characteristics? Whatever happened to admitting homely girls who were good at differential calculus to college? Or nerds who taught themselves to program and used that to publish a photo book of the girls in the freshman class so guys could know who they wanted to date and now they had the phone numbers to call up their weekend fantasies. 

Does she look like America?
 But she's cute, so let her in


Even if we did decide to look like America: What would that even mean? That might mean that we'd have people with different skin colors, and maybe they'd even speak different languages at home--Spanish, French, Zulu, Swahili, Dutch, Africans, German, Russian--but, truth be told, even if theses folks had parents who spoke those languages, if they were American raised, likely they'd speak only one language. 

If you speak two languages, you are bilingual. If you speak only one language, you are American.



Now, on Starship Enterprise, it was lovely to see people of all different races, and even some folks with pointed ear pinnae who might not even be homo sapiens, working harmoniously without a trace of racial prejudice. It's a vision of a better world, a better future. But if we learned that Dr. Spock was selected for the crew because he filled the Vulcan quota,  would that not diminish the joy?



So, these are some of the unexamined articles of faith we hear and so uncritically accept, and Mad Dog feels ever so much better getting this all off his half Klingon half Hobbit chest.










Wednesday, April 8, 2026

TACO Tuesday at the Phantom Toll Booth




Last night, Tuesday, April 7, 2026 did not end a thousand year old civilization. Total war against Iran did not ignite and a ceasefire, which many pundits had told us was not something Iran would ever accept, actually took hold.




Why Iran would not be expected to accept a cease fire was blatantly obvious: The U.S., and most notably its ally in this war, Israel, has ignored every ceasefire, and in fact the U.S. tends to step up its bombing during negotiations. And Israel, well just ask Gaza about ceasefires with Israel.

But the Iranians, unlike Mr. Trump, are no fools, and if they can get something without losing their power plants and bridges, they are shrewd enough to take that deal.

Now, if reporting can be believed, they've got Trump accepting Iranian tolls on ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz, which they never had before, in a tacit concession by Mr. Trump that the Iranians hold all the cards in that critical passageway. They've come away with a Phantom Toll booth--not a bad deal for them.




But Trump can claim a victory, and maybe he can go home, or at least he can allow the Marines and the U.S. Navy to go home after they flex their Rambo muscles for a while.

Fact is, the Iranians live there, and they cannot and have no reason to try to leave.

It's not like the Israeli settlers who claim land owned by Palestinians, and move in, mow down houses and build their own: Americans don't want to live around Hormuz--they don't even want to build expensive Condos there for time sharing and luxury beach front property. 

Mr. Putin must be laughing, with his bros in the Kremlin, and, in case you've forgotten, Renee Good and Alex Pretti are still dead. Pete Hegseth has not brought them back from the dead. 



And Jeffrey Epstein did not hang himself. 

 

Monday, April 6, 2026

Tuesday's Gone



 "Tuesday will be power plant day and bridge day, all wrapped up in one in Iran. There will be nothing like it. Open the fuckin strait, you crazy bastards, or you’ll be living in hell. Just watch. Praise be to Allah."

--Donald J. Trump, President of the United States of America




During the Second World War, the United States Navy unleashed naval bombardment on Japanese troops who were protected deep inside cement tunnels, only to emerge to slaughter American marines once the bombing stopped. 

During the Cuban Missile Crisis, as President Kennedy considered his options, the possibility of simply launching a quick strike with Marines to depose Castro and to defeat the Cuban government was considered. Marine Commandant David Shoup briefed President Kennedy and his advisors. General Shoup displayed a large map of Cuba, and in the middle of the island was a red dot. That red dot was to scale representing the island of Tarawa. "It took us 18,000 Marines," he said and the casualties were enormous. What do you think, he asked, the cost of invading Cuba would be, and how long would it take? 

Charlottesville Rambos


JFK was a veteran of the Pacific war, where Guadalcanal, another small island, claimed the lives of seven thousand Marines and took 6 months to subdue.

 JFK took invasion off the table. 

Donald J. Trump's bone spurs precluded any chance he would have first hand knowledge of what combat can and cannot achieve. 

There is an old adage in the Pentagon: "Never allow an air force general to be chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff when you are facing a ground war: They only know what you can see from ten thousand feet." Which is to say, you cannot win a war with air power alone.  When air force generals argue that World War Two was ended by the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, they are wrong.  Japan was already defeated by naval blockade, and an island hopping grinding war and when the Russians entered the war and overwhelmed  the Japanese army in Manchuria, the Japanese finally capitulated. The atomic bombs were not decisive. 

What really worries most of the true cognoscenti is that Israel may use a score of atomic bombs against Iran, as Israel faces effective missile and drone strikes from Iran which Israel's "Iron Dome" cannot defend against.

And, of course, Trump's threats are empty. Even if he damaged Iran's economy and infrastructure severely, the damage to Western, and yes, to America's economy would be worse.

The question is: Can Trump's advisors put together a video to show him which might help him understand this.

Russia expected a quick victory in Ukraine. They did not expect drones would decimate their columns of tanks.

The best we can hope for is a TACO (Trump always chickens out) Tuesday.



Meanwhile, Renee Good and Alex Pretti are still dead.

And so, for that matter, is Jeffrey Epstein.