Saturday, April 8, 2017

You Say You Want a Revolution?

Bernie Sanders usually started off his stump speech by asking the crowd, "Are you ready for a revolution?"
And the place would go wild.

But the revolution Bernie was talking about was a class struggle, taxing the rich more, and providing more opportunities for the struggling middle class, health insurance, free college education, a stairway to better jobs.

But here is the revolution Mad Dog would offer if he were running. 
When the Republicans realize they control enough state houses and governorships to convene a constitutional convention, when they are drunk with dreams of writing into the Constitution articles forbidding abortion, flag burning, speaking any language but English in public places,  taking the Trump name in vain, making War on Christmas, immigration of non whites, taking the Lord's name in vain, disparaging NASCAR, and another article re-instituting slavery, well the Democrats should just play along, smiling, nodding their way through all this and, once the Republicans have gone out and got good and drunk the Dems could slip in an article which allows states to leave the union and form independent nation states, confederations of their own choosing. 

This should appeal to the Southern states, given their history of having fought a four year war over this in the past. The Dems could frame it: Look, the Lost Cause can still be won in the 21st century.  We agree, divorce should be an option. After all, they're doing it in Europe.

It was, in fact, the example of Europe which moved President Lincoln to cleave to the idea there should be one continental American nation.  Europe had been riven by war and bloodshed for centuries and Lincoln maintained, we needed to avoid all that with an indissoluble union. Of course, later he admitted, that was something of a marketing pitch and the whole war was really over slavery, as he said in his second Inaugural address. 

But, here's the thing: If the six New England states left and invited at least some of the middle Atlantic states, say New York, Maryland, Delaware, New Jersey, and the West Coast states and Illinois, and maybe Minnesota.  We could do pretty well, economically at least, as the New American Union.  

The whole idea of contiguous borders is so 20th century. With people tele-commuting, and with air travel and the internet, you really don't need to be able to reach out and physically touch your countrymen. 

And the Southern states and the Mountain states and the Southwestern states (except for New Mexico), all those "fly over states"  are always grousing about how oppressive Washington, DC is, how that federal government is an occupying power, a distant black helicopter state. They don't like government much, at least federal government. So, let them go.

They could print their own money and put Jefferson Davis and Stonewall Jackson and Robert E. Lee and George Armstrong Custer on it. They could reinstate Andrew Jackson and add the grand dragon of the Ku Klu Klan, if they want to. 
They could be happy without us. 
Well, spiritually. 
Economically, not so much. But hey, it's just money.


Economically, the states which complain most about the oppressive federal tax burden are actually the ones who get the most from it, so let them go and fend for themselves. We won't miss them.





Defense spending as a portion of a state's GDP is highest in states like Mississippi and Kentucky.  We could move all those military bases and factories to New England and California and Illinois. I count the New American Union as having: Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Maryland, Delaware, Illinois, Minnesota, Washington, Oregon, California and New Mexico.  Sweet 16. Others could apply. Maybe some states, like Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan and Wisconsin could redraw their boundaries to separate red counties from blue counties and the redrawn states could apply to the union. 
Of course, there would be some states we would feel sorry for:  The research triangle in North Carolina, parts of Florida, northern Virginia, Atlanta, Austin Texas, New Orleans. There would be those islands of sanity in a sea of red we just likely could not help. 

Our New American Union would have a Congress free of Mitch McConnell and Trey Gowdy and Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio and Louie Gohmert.  
Think of that.  
We would not be totally  rid of all the unappetizing trolls--even in Massachusetts there were Trump voters, but we would really change the mix. 
And New Hampshire, which came within a couple of thousand votes of going for Trump, might teeter off into lunacy every so often. But, it might be people in all states would "self deport," and find themselves gravitating not just to walled communities of similar belief, but to states where they feel more at home.



In divorces, a common remark by one or both of the parting spouses is, "I never realized how much you really disliked me."  When people have to stay together, they bite their lips and just suck it up. But when they no longer have to get along, they can say what they really feel.

And I suspect, when we let Texas, South Carolina, Arizona, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Kansas and Indiana go, folks in the  remaining New Union states will heave a great cleansing sigh of relief and say: "Why did we suffer so long? Why didn't we do this years ago?"
Obadiah Youngblood, Tugboat


Friday, April 7, 2017

John Bolton: Dolt of the Day

John Bolton was on Fox News this morning explaining how we got into such a place with Syria.
It's Obama's fault, of course.
Blame it on the Obama-onva.
He served in the National Guard--an expert in military affairs

Mr. Bolton was Ambassador to the UN under some Republican and has had posts in Republican administrations and he lives just outside Washington, D.C., so whenever Fox needs a hit man to say it's all Obama's fault, he's available.

It seems President Obama "let" Mr. Putin put in airbases in Syria in 2013, and now that the Russians have ensconced themselves in Syria, well, it's just all gone to Hell in a handbasket.

What President Obama should have done when the Russians started building those air bases was...
Well, you know.
Something.
Something really effective.
Something bold.
Something manly.

Like what President Trump just did. Calls up the Russians and says, "We are going to precision bomb that air base at Shayrat." So the Russians roll out and the Syrians can't help but notice that, so they hop in their war planes and move them out, all but the six MIG planes in the shop--so the lame planes get blown up.
Trump showed those Syrians. President Assad must be quaking in his Gucci loafers. Oh, Trump is unpredictable. Oh, he is impulsive. He is a wild and crazy guy! Not so impulsive he picked out the "bomb the palace" option from the platter his generals presented him, but he is impulsive in a way the coal miners in Kentucky will like. 
Oh, President Heel Spur is just so fearsome! Eighty-six babies get gassed and he is outraged and takes out six out of service MIG fighters! 

President Putin was not pleased. He says he's not Trump,s best bro no mo. Steel workers in Pennsylvania will be glad to hear that. Pundits on TV are all saying this takes the heat off Trump for his Putin connection during the election campaign. 
Say what?

President Trump knows how to draw a line in the sand.  

I saw that announcement, with the President standing in front of the American flag at Mar-a-largo.  Couldn't help but think President Reagan would have done it better. Peggy Noonan was a better speech writer than whoever Trump has writing his speeches. Or maybe, that's the problem. The same guy who writes his Tweets writes his speeches.  
And Reagan would have gone for a different setting, maybe an American airbase, or even an aircraft carrier, with the wind in his great hair, and the Star Spangled Banner afterwards. (Of course, given the suspicions about President Trump's hair, maybe the aircraft carrier, wind in the hair bit wouldn't be such a great idea.) It's just the idea he's at Mar-a-largo, with booze hounds in the bar, and golf courses as a back drop, sort of detracts from the fearsome warrior image. 
I mean, just the name, "Mar-a-largo."  Doesn't sound all that serious. Sort of like Bali Hai. Sort of evokes images of Polynesian women swaying to ukulele music  in straw skirts with some enormously fat guy singing "Somewhere Over the Rainbow."  But maybe that's just me.
But I digress. Back to Mr. Bolton.
Mr. Bolton was at Yale Law School with Bill and Hillary Clinton and he never quite got over the fact they became so famous, powerful and rich and he's been marching into Fox studios ever since to show he can be just as famous and influential as the Clinton's.
He knows more than the generals

And President Obama has been just the best target for Mr. Bolton because Obama's Presidency simplified everything. Yes, George W. might have miscalculated a little getting our troops bogged down in Iraq looking for those weapons of mass destruction Mr. Bolton just knew were in the hands of Sadam Hussein. But Obama! Oh, well, just look at the mess he has made.
An all purpose mess.
Why, that gassing of babies--Obama's fault.

And ISIS, well, don't you Obama founded that group with Hillary.
Obama probably had a piece of that child sex trafficking operation Hillary was running out of that pizza place on Connecticut Avenue.
Oh, those two. Just so corrupt.

What Mr. Bolton can't figure out is why President Trump never called him for the Secretary of State post.
Obama probably black balled him.


Gassed Babies Avenged by Cosmetic Air Strike

Those who ignore history are condemned to retweet it.
--David Brooks

Soooo, what did the Syrian airmen do when they noticed all the Russians packing up and leaving the Shayrat airbase? 



Did they not say, "Hey, Boris? Where're you going?"
"Oh, nowhere, Achmed, just getting off the base ahead of the U.S. Tomahawk missile attack, which is due here in about four hours."
"Gee, Boris, do you think we ought to move our airplanes?"
"Well, that's up to you, Achmed.  But I wouldn't leave the keys to your car in that plane you got parked under that concrete arch."

So, President Trump was just appalled by Assad gassing babies to death, so he ordered some precision bombing which took out, what I'm guessing were empty airplane bunkers, but left the runways and Saran gas dumps intact. 
We are now told, by various sources, 6 MIG warplanes which were being repaired were destroyed. Which means? You don't need a PhD to speculate all the working war planes were evacuated before the strike because: WE TOLD THE RUSSIANS THE MISSILES WERE COMING.
The Syrian air force personnel must have been disgruntled about having to run out and move their airplanes on short notice. And the noise of those explosions! My dog went crazy during the thunderstorms in Hampton last night--I can only imagine the poor Syrian dogs near that airbase.
So we had a feel good moment.  Or Trump did. Or maybe all those tough talking, crew cut Republicans you see on Fox News and all the other networks. Oh, we showed them!  We sent a message! Oh, Assad will think twice before disobeying Trump again!  Wow, is Trump tough, or what?



And about those dead, gassed babies: Do you think the babies--beautiful babies--much cared whether they were gassed or blown to bits by barrel bombs? Apparently, this made all the difference to President Trump, the idea of killing beautiful babies with gas.
So what Mr. Trump is saying is: "Oh, you can bomb them, but you just cannot gas them."

But did anyone ever ask the babies?
Oh, and by the way, beautiful babies, you are still not welcomed in the US of A. Well, maybe we'd take in some beautiful babies, but none of those Trojan horse parents.

We have very selective sympathies, here in America. We like cute things.





Thursday, April 6, 2017

Senator Corker: Syria's Obama's Fault

One thing you can say for Republicans, they are shameless; they got chutzpah.
It's all Obama's fault. Certainly Congress is blameless.


This morning, the chairman of the Senate foreign relations committee, Bob Corker, of Tennessee,  claimed if President Obama had only done some unnamed thing right back in 2013, we would never have had Assad dropping those chemical weapons on those villagers in Syria today.


As Alisyn Camerota pointed out, when Obama made noises about taking military action, the Senate and House told him their constituents had no appetite for spending more America lives or treasure in defense of Syrians and Obama had to settle for getting Russia to get Assad to agree to get rid of his chemical weapons, which, apparently he either did not do or he simply made new chemical weapons.
Doesn't he look good in that uniform?


Back in 2013, Corker was all for taking some sort of military action against Assad, because, as he said this morning, he had been to the Syrian refugee camps, and seen the suffering, but even today he could not really say exactly what military action he wanted Obama to take. If only Obama hadn't been so irresolute. If only he had drawn that red line in the sand and done something, (!) well, then Assad would have taken America seriously. It's all about sending the message. Whatever that may be.


As Richard Russell told Lyndon Johnson, when Johnson asked what he ought to do about Vietnam--Russell said, "You know, you don't really want to be in Vietnam."
LBJ replied, "Well, that's for damn sure."
Russell, "Well, them Viet Cong.  They know that, too."


Every time I hear some simpleton Congressman or neighbor say, "Oh, Obama was so stupid, telling them when we are going to leave! Trump is right. You don't tell them."
Well, Einstein, the point is, they can listen to the news. They know President Obama, President Trump, not a single American President wants to be in their dusty, God forsaken pitiful excuse for a country country. We are going to get out and they will still be  there. We do not need or want their oil. We sure as hell don't have any interest in hanging out at their bazaars watching them stone women to death or chop off hands and heads.  So whether we announce a date or not, they know all they have to do is stay there and they'll outlast us. Memo to American morons: We are not fooling them by refusing to announce a departure date. They do not need a date.


As for Syria, I suppose we could have simply assassinated Assad and left Syria to find a new strongman. Would we then have had another failed Middle Eastern state like Iraq? Whatever, we don't want to be there shoring up Syria as we are failing to do in Iraq.


Well, today, a new Syrian leader  looks more appetizing than having a functional Syria headed by a monster, but then you get ISIS popping up like whack a moles.


So now the Republicans have got out their playbooks and Trump and the Congressional Republicans are all singing, "It's Obama's fault."


I guess those voters in Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Ohio are all nodding in agreement.
I would recommend to all of these heartland, rust belt voters the movie "Born on the Fourth of July" or maybe, "The Deerhunter."  It's fine to be low information voters and ignorant and simple, but look what happens to your sons and daughters when the sleaze balls they vote for get into office.
President Trump Says It's Obama's Fault.


You're lucky if you come home in a flag draped coffin. The unlucky ones are quadraplegics in their wheel chairs with their colostomy bags.


Of course, what never gets asked when some lame brain like Senator Corker starts talking is this:  Senator, every few months we see some horrible images on TV of kids gassed, a toddler face down in the sand on a beach after his refugee boat overturned and he drowned, a kid in a hospital with his arm blow off and we get all sympathetic to the suffering of babies and kids and women who are caught in the crossfire of wars.  And we say, "We've got to DO something!" It's terrible watching such suffering.  But the question is: What can we do?  And which of these people on this conveyor belt of death and dismemberment do we decide to step in and help by whacking their attackers?  Syria today?  Boco Harum tomorrow?  The Taliban in Afghanistan the next day?  ISIS in Iraq? Radical somebodies in Libya? Nasties in Somalia or Sudan? 


Beyond sputtering and fuming, do we have anybody who actually has brains enough to say:  let's think about this and do something effective when we can and realize when we cannot.




Tuesday, April 4, 2017

They Still Don't Get It: CNN and The Message

Aliyson Camerota is just the sort of news woman I want to love: She's liberal; she's articulate and she's pissed off.


She wants us to send a message


But she's not, truth be told, bright enough.
She's very smart, I'm sure in many ways, but she is not smart enough in one way: She has not learned. She clings to concepts without examining them.
And one of the most agonizing, frustrating experiences on earth is to see someone from your team floundering miserably attacking a common enemy.


This morning she had two "experts" on the Middle East to discuss the report that the President of Syria had dropped bombs delivering poison nerve gas against his target village and then he bombed the hospital where the victims were taken.
Send this guy a message.


Ms. Camerota asked each expert to say what they had been brought on set to say: This "sends the wrong message" to "the Middle East."


Ms. Camerota then informed us that:
1. The President of Syria is a monster.
2. The Russians like him.
3. The Iranians like him.
4. The United States should stand up against him, because we are the only potential force for good in Syria and the Middle East.
5. Trump has waved off any role for the United States in opposing, undoing or dethroning the President of Syria. Qui Tacit Consentit.


Ms. Camerota apparently was not listening when Bernie Sanders said the Middle East is a quagmire within a quagmire.
Is he programed to receive?


Pray tell:  what exactly does it mean "to send a message?"
If the President of Syria hears the United States Secretary of State or the President of the United States say that anyone who uses poison gas on his people is a bad man, or should not be in power, how does that change anything?


Just, specifically, what would Ms. Camerota have the United States do about all those monsters who are not in Syria?  Like, for example, Somalia, or Libya or Afghanistan or Pakistan or Niger or anywhere Boco Haram is, or those kidnappers in the cartels of Mexico or in Guatemala or Honduras or Haiti or Bolivia? 
Send him a message? Was he listening?

This could be a summer course at the university: What is the role of a "great power" in the face of evil empires scattered across the face of planet earth? Should we mobilize a fleet of drones to drop bombs on bad guys? Should we send in the Marines? Should we institute a draft and send out our armies of the American way? Should we send some other  mothers' sons in Special Ops units to kill bad guys with our snipers?


Or should we simply invite on our TV set some guy in an authentic Middle East get up and a goatee to say that we are, in our silence, "sending the wrong message?"




I think they're trying to send a message.

Friday, March 31, 2017

"Homeland" Makes the US Senate More Real

Had I not seen "Homeland," now in it's 6th season, last night I would not have comprehended what the witnesses testifying before the Senate Committee on Intelligence were talking about this morning.
Clinton Watts: Follow the Bodies

The panel answering questions included a  Georgetown professor Godson and a live wire named Clinton Weeks, a former FBI agent now cyber security/terrorist consultant, who provided a punchy, quotable counter part to the more lugubrious professor ,who actually had some real wisdom to impart but the Senators kept cutting him off because he is about 70 years old and has not learned how to express complex thoughts in 140 characters.
Watts, on the other hand, is younger and apparently doesn't care what the Senators think of him, and he suggested at one point, when asked how we might come to an understanding about what the Russians are up to, "Well, just follow the dead bodies." 
There are all sorts of Russian, who have had something to do with disinformation schemes turning up dead on the streets of Moscow, London, Kiev and who knows where else?

I've been asking all my friends for months: What difference does it make whether Russia tried to influence the 2016 American election?  Everyone was trying to influence that election from the FBI, to the DNC to the RNC to the UK to advertising agencies in the employ of various PAC's , to--you name it. They still had to persuade American voters.

This is where "Homeland" comes in.  Max stumbles into a trollstation, run by a deliciously nasty, oily, smarmy Steve Bannon/ Rush Limbaugh/Fox News type called Brett O'Keefe,  who makes his fat living on conspiracy theories and Breitbart fake news.  He has obtained the helmet cam from the last mission showing the death of the President elect's son, which he edits in such a way to make it look like the son was fleeing from the enemy when, in fact, he was rushing forward to rescue one of his fellow soldiers.  This is run with a tag, "Cowardice runs in the family."

The seamy underside of this troll station is shown on Homeland visually,  but the testimony at the Senate fleshed out how trolls actually can do their damage.
Watts described how Russian trolls got voter registrations in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania and targeted fake news stories to specific voters in those states with nuggets like Hillary was running a child sex ring out of a pizza joint in Washington, how she was dying of AIDS and other juicy bits which could then be re tweeted across Facebook and other sites. If you can just find where the crazies, borderline personalities, unhinged live, then you can push their buttons big time. Then these alarmed patriots do their 21st century version of Paul Revere's ride and alert everyone on Facebook, Linked In, Twitter and who knows what?
Counties which voted for Obama and Trump: Trolls Did Their Work Well


Of course, all this depends on the gullibility and stupidity and lack of critical capacity of a public which also devours National Enquirer space alien stories, but when Watts described how methodically you could seek out the Kool Aid drinkers in these critical states, you could see just how they could have manipulated the election.

Citizens United is irrelevant if all that affects is TV advertising. Who even notices TV ads any more, when you've got a story about Hillary cashing in insurance policies from the dead foreign service officers of Benghazi?
I saw it on Breitbart and Fox: It Must Be True

As Watts noted, when you've got a fat target for your fake news in the commander-in-chief, that's all you really need. If you can count that pushing his button will immediately get the response you want, aren't you sitting pretty? All they have to do is feed Mr. Trump a story and it's gone viral at 5AM the next morning.  Obama tapped the White House, 3 million fraudulent ballots, the FBI killed Vince Foster on Hillary's orders and Obama was born on Kenya, the son of space aliens.

Angus King observed Vladimir Putin was dealt a really poor hand, but he played it superbly. He could not match the US in expenditures for aircraft carriers and warplanes, but he could invest a paltry few million in cyber warriors and get the results he wanted in the election.


Watts added that Putin did not even have to depend on Trump winning. If Trump won, terrific. But if Putin could stain and damage Hillary Clinton enough, even if she won, she would come to office wounded, damaged goods.

Why did the US not match Russian trolls and cyber manipulations?   Because spending money on hardware, airplanes and ships is so much more appealing than investing in software and human beings.  As Watts  noted wryly, while the Russians were recruiting and training cyber warriors who were exploiting voting sectors in Wisconsin, the US was rejecting good potential hackers and trolls because "they'd smoked weed at some geek party ten years ago."

Obadiah Youngblood, Red House

Even the stone faced woman sitting behind Mr. Watts had to smile at that.





Thursday, March 30, 2017

Playing President on TV

You know that TV commercial, "I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV."
The implication being, oh, well, that's all you really need to be regarded as a real doctor, because what's on TV is real. It's a fact.



Mr. Trump, seems to me, is just a fake President, but he plays one on TV.

Worst thing for a bad product: Good Advertising


Thing is, likely that's good enough for 40 million Americans, maybe 60 million.
They keep interviewing Trump voters and nary a one seems to have any second thoughts about their votes.

Obadiah Youngblood, Goonie Bird Pink Lake