Joni of the Sharp Shears |
Even though she is a Republican, I was somehow cheered to see the Castrator made it to Congress. Joni Ernst ran on the platform that because she grew up castrating hogs, she should would bring something new and valuable to Washington, D.C. I can see her point. She replaces Tom Harkin in the Senate and she will be a breath of fresh air: She believes states ought to be able to nullify federal laws, an idea which harkens back to what resulted in the Civil War; she has called for arresting federal officials attempting to implement Obamacare; she agrees with Glenn Beck about a world conspiracy centered in the United Nations; she still insists George W was correct about Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq--we just haven't found them yet. This is a woman with a fresh perspective on things. The great mystery to Mad Dog is she is from Iowa, not South Carolina, Arizona or Texas. In those states, she is main line.
Fact is, she has got herself a promising career and she is not mired in conventional thought.
When Betty Friedan wrote the Feminine Mystique in the early 1960's her major, breakthrough insight was that women were unfulfilled and unhappy despite having been told paradise on earth was a home with lots of modern appliances, a husband, children and material wealth. Friedan made it acceptable for women to look at their lives and ask themselves if the conventional life was really as honorable, fulfilling and wonderful as everyone said it was. Each woman, in the privacy of her home, had to ask herself if one man, one life was enough. She did not have to feel guilty for asking this question. You have everything. Why are you looking for more?
Betty Friedan |
So women went to work, and found new satisfactions and new frustrations, but who could be as happy as a castrating female Senator?
Betty Ice Princess |
Of course, this was the trap which Betty in Mad Men found herself: Beautiful husband, great house, kids, cars, horses to ride, but somehow, something was missing. In Betty's case, the hole in her life could not be filled by a single liaison in the men's room of a Manhattan bar; eventually she traded for a new husband, which did not seem to solve the problem either.
The problem, of course, was never the golden trap of wealth; the trap was buying into what you had been taught by the prevailing authorities about what will make you happy.
When Mad Dog was struggling through his adolescence, when his seventeen year old with red lips was not concealed inside, but in full display, he kept running into girls who had been told that happiness was being a virgin on your wedding night. These were mostly the girls with good grades and hot college prospects. He ultimately discovered girls whose grades may not have been as stellar, but who laughed at the idea of restrictions on their sexual appetites or their prospects in life.
"I'll go through men the way men go through razor blades," one hotly pursued girl friend told him. "Men are disposable. I'll be a partner in a law firm and I'll command my own destiny."
That was a breath taking notion to Mad Dog in those days, because he did not feel he was at all in command of his own destiny. In fact, she went off to college, then law school, and now works in Washington, DC in the federal government. She did go through quite a few men along the way.
Mad Dog has heard, from mutual friends, she's had some rocky times, emotionally, but not because she chose to reject convention. About that, reportedly, she has never had regrets. She ultimately did one conventional thing: She married the coolest guy in high school. He played football, became a Rhodes Scholar and ultimately a war correspondent. Mad Dog used to listen to him cover Bosnia on NPR. But then a college friend of hers visited them in London and her husband ran off to Europe with the friend on the back of his motorcycle. So she came home, went to work for the government.
Mad Dog hopes she's considering a run for Congress.
As a Democrat, of course.
Mad Dog,
ReplyDeleteOne of the thing I like most about you is your ability to recognize the possibilities, even in the midst of gloomy circumstances-and a Republican woman- with a penchant for castrating things- now a newly elected Senator does present a myriad of possibilities- especially since, as you so amusingly state, she's not exactly "mired in conventional thought"....Why she may have the ability to do what a lot of other Senators, on both sides of the aisle, have been unable to do-rein in Ted Cruz...perhaps with the looming threat of Sen. Ernst and her handiwork, Cruz may suddenly learn to play well with others..If not, Joni can "fix" him, so to speak, once and for all-it works with dogs....
In any case, we do certainly need more women in Congress-slightly less than 20% isn't exactly cause for celebration...Yes women's lives are different today than in the past, but for many life still remains a "pay now or pay later" scenario... Women who stay home with the kids do reap benefits.Their peers, that head off to full time work outside the home when the kids are growing, are not wrong in thinking they're missing things, because the reality is they are...Twenty years later situations are reversed and the stay-at -home moms face the uncomfortable reality of not being old and yet becoming obsolete...time for a Plan B-not impossible, but not easy at their age...for a variety of reasons, even in 2014, a woman's reality remains significantly different than that of a man's...maybe more women in positions of power would eventually change that more substantially...
Maud
Maud,
ReplyDeleteDepends how you define power. In Hampton, I can think of stay at home mothers who do the grassroots political stuff which get U.S. Senators elected, who take drive their family members to doctors, who launch their kids into productive lives. These are powerful women in the most basic sense. I've seen women doctors who are so torn in so many directions they cannot do anything really effectively. They may look authoritative and powerful, but they cannot hold a candle to women of real character who create effective families. I've seen enough of subcultures where the mothers are dysfunctional to believe what really holds our society together lies in a type of power we don't much celebrate.
Mad Dog
Mad Dog,
ReplyDeleteWas wondering why you removed the post on Ron Kovic and Tomas Young..
Maud
Maud,
ReplyDeleteI've been doing a magical mystery tour of both blogs--going back to look at prior postings and the responses.
One reason I stopped writing books is I found I was repeating myself, really had nothing new to say.
Found I had already written a blog which covered the same ground as the Kovic/Young thing.( Really wrote it because you mentioned Tomas Young and I hadn't heard of him, so I googled.)
Feel like one of those old gomers who keep telling the same story over and over--it's embarrassing.
Also look at the responses, number of views, whether or not Maud has had anything to say. So, in a way, you are my canary--if you stop singing, I figure, the air was toxic.
I did not, you'll note, remove the post on the Yale professor, even though you were (justifiably) annoyed by my posting her picture and making the topic her pulchritude rather than her thinking. Really considered removing that one on the Maud factor alone, but there was enough interest in that one for me to leave it up.
Phantom
Mad Dog,
ReplyDeleteI, my friend, am a most unreliable canary..my lack of responses are in no way a reflection on your posts, which are as insightful, thought provoking and amusing as ever...and I haven't noticed you repeating yourself, however I'm fairly certain I'm guilty of that...I often can't remember if what I'm writing is something I did tell you or something I wanted to tell you, but never got around to it..so, let me take this opportunity, right now, to apologize for all past and future repetitive statements and stories-I'm sure there'll be more....
Maud