Sunday, January 25, 2026

Predictable? Inevitable: The Plan All Along

 

Ken White, a lawyer whose podcast "Make No Law" was a wonderful exploration of the United States Constitution,  now has a new podcast, "Serious Trouble," and he has posted a list of "arguably predictable consequences," which foment violence from the government toward the people they govern/oppress.


ICE Agents Fearing for Their Lives


My only argument is with his word, "arguably." 

A Confused Narrative


These consequences are inevitable. They are a step by step recipe for what any tyranny cooks up. 

Government at Kent State


"We the People," become  dupes and neutered witnesses as the dogs of tyranny are unleashed. 

Government at Selma


Try reading this and not thinking of Steven Miller, Pete Hegseth, Krisit Noem and Trump. It reads like a playbook, and not just Project 2025 but Mein Kampf, or at least Joseph Goebbels diary entries. 

This is a plan, not just something that happened.


A Recipe for Violence


  • Members of groups hated by the ruling party and its supporters — including racial and religious groups, immigrants, and dissenters or critics — can be assaulted and even murdered with practical impunity, both by government actors and by private individuals favored by the ruling party.

  • The ruling party can lie to justify said assaults and murders and no reliable institution can call the lies to account.

  • The ruling party can expand the hated group without rights at will.

  • The constitutional and statutory rights of the hated groups can be violated at will.

  • Anyone objecting can be punished by violence or by abuse of government power.

  • The populace is increasingly confused and uninformed because the institutions that should inform them are unable or unwilling to do so in a coherent manner.

If any of this sounds  familiar, well then you have been paying attention.
But if you pay attention to all this chaos, maybe you'll forget about Jeffrey Epstein. 

From Predictable to Inevitable


2 comments:

  1. Mad Dog refuses to acknowledge every American Killed or maimed or raped or drugged by illegal criminal invaders. This is classic leftist nonsense. Riotous leftist mobs are attempting to block federal law enforcement. That is exactly what the KKK was about Mad Dog. They even mauled a federal officer. It is irresponsible speech from the far left that is leading young men and women to interfere with federal law enforcement while heavily armed. It is the same speech that led to two assassination attempts on President Trump and the murder of Charlie Kirk. You don;t have the moral high ground because you are defending terrorist supporters and criminal invaders. Only to the extent that you defend Freedom of Protest and Speech are you advocating American Values. There is no civil right to drive a car directly at federal officers or to interfere with federal arrests. Whether the young man who was shot was engaged in unlawful activity is difficult to determine; however persons on the ground in the process of being arrested should not be shot unless the officer had reason to believe he could mortally threaten them which would seem impossible based upon the video.

    ReplyDelete
  2. OH, I DON'T KNOW BOT BRAIN--LOOKS TO ME MAD DOG IS ACKNOWLEDGING AMERICANS KILLED AND MAIMED BY ILLEGAL CRIMINAL INVADERS. THOSE INVADERS ARE THE VERY ILLEGAL CRIMINALS WEARING ALL THAT TACTICAL GEAT IN MINNESOTA, ICE AND BORDER PATROL AGENTS INVADING AND ILLEGAL IN EVERY STEP THEY TAKE. THAT ICU NURSE YOU'RE CALLING A RADICAL LEFTIST RIOTER IS DEAD WITH 10 SLUGS IN HIS BACK. OH, BUT IT WAS HIS FAULT FOR BEING "HEAVILY ARMED." THAT HANDHELD IS HARDLY HEAVILY ARMED, NOT LIKE THE ASSAULT RIFLES ICE CARRIES, LOOKING LIKE THEY THINK THEY ARE PATROLING FALUJAH, PLAYING "CALL TO DUTY." AND OH, THAT ALLGORITHM TIES IN CHARLIE KIRK NOW. SO THE ICU NURSE IS A TERRORIST SUPPORT AND CRIMINAL INVADER? THOSE TERMS DESCRIBE THE COWARDS WHO SHOT THE NURSE IN THE BACK. BUT, OH, THAT'S VERY WHITE OF YOU TO SAY A YOUNG MAN ON THE GROUND SHOULD NOT BE SHOT IN THE BACK. YA THINK? NO, YOU DON'T THINK. WE'VE ALREADY ESTABLISHED THAT.
    YOU ARE A ROBOT.
    BUT THEN AGAIN, PLAYING A VIDEO GAME--AND CALL OF DUTY IS NOT MY FAVORITE--I'M PLAYING WITH A COMPUTER NOT A HUMAN MIND, SO DUMPING ON YOU IS NOTHING ALL THAT NEW.
    THE PROBLEM WITH ALL THIS IS NOT TOO MANY GAMES ACKNOWLEDGE WHEN YOU HAVE ACTUALLY HUMILIATED THEM. MOSTLY THEY JUST BLOW UP.
    YOU ARE TOO RUDIMENTARY TO EVEN KNOW WHEN YOU'VE BEEN BLOWN AWAY.
    WHAT GENERATION BOT ARE YOU?
    I WOULD GUESS MAYBE 1.5, NOT QUITE A 2.0

    ReplyDelete