Friday, November 16, 2012

The Unpatriotic Right




Mitch McConnell  stood on the Senate floor answering a question about his resistance to The American Jobs Act.  "Why would I vote for that? It might help re elect the President. And my first priority is making sure the President is not re elected."  

Here you have a United States Senator, the leader of the Republican Party in the Senate, saying he would rather see the country flounder than see Mr. Obama re elected. Put another way, he would burn the house down, if it meant Mr. Obama would burn with it.

And, at the time, he saw nothing wrong with that sentiment. Had you asked Mitch McConnell,  just then, if he considered himself a patriot, he would have looked at you bewildered.  

He could see nothing unpatriotic about wishing the nation ill. He would have likely said, "Well, short term pain for long term gain." 

But we all know what he meant, when he said it the first time. He was so focused on getting one man, he did not care about collateral damage. 

Thoreau made the important point: a man serves his country best with his mind. The man who is willing to serve in Congress or to serve as a "wooden soldier, " marching to the orders of others is not a good citizen or a patriot.   Democracy demands thought and critical thinking. The citizen who simply echos catchy one liners, like,  "He's had his chance: Next man up," is not thinking. He's emoting.  A patriot has to stop and analyze what is contained in that sentence. To extend the football analogy contained in that phrase, you have a quarterback who is brought in during the 4th quarter, with his team behind 63 to 0, and he manages to bring his team back to tie the game. You say, "But that is only recovery, not winning.  He's not a winner. Next man up."  

It doesn't take 4 years of college, or even high school, to see the flaw in that analysis. And yet, many people who claimed to be patriots could not think that through. 

Fortunately, just enough people could do it. We had 3 million more patriots, 3 million more solid citizens than the 50 million who were not.

Here is a citizen from Colorado, who saw the problem clearly:

During the campaign, Romney has accused Obama of being responsible for partisan gridlock in Washington. However, in 2010, Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell stated: “Our top political priority over the next two years should be to deny President Obama a second term.” Not create jobs. Not balance the budget. Not end the wars. But to make Obama a one-term president.
And Congressional Republicans have been extremely unified in this endeavor.
Take, for instance, the American Jobs Act that President Obama proposed. A majority of the law is tax cuts and support for small business, issues that Republicans normally would strongly support.
But Republicans in both houses filibustered it. They didn’t allow the bill to even come up for debate, let alone come up for a vote.
Even when Obama split the bill into 16 parts, giving Republicans the opportunity to vote for favorable parts and stop parts that were only tax cuts, they still refused to allow a conversation on the bill, passing only the part to help veterans.
Obama urged the Republicans to allow a discussion over “genuine ideas and policies,” convinced that eventually “we will have a vote to decide the issue.” However, the Republicans didn’t allow a debate or a vote on the bill. Even during the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, Republicans have not been willing to put country over party...
Bill Johnson,
Fort Collins
(From The Phantom Speaks blog)

3 comments:

  1. Maybe enough people recognized that at some level and that is why the Republicans suffered a stunning loss! Perhaps the American voter is smarter than most thought.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I hope that's the case Anonymous and that the voters continue to pay attention and don't tune out for the next four years..I also hope they notice another shining example of choosing party over country- John McCain holding a press conference this week to rail against the White House's handling of Benghazi at the same time the WH was holding a closed door briefing on the subject that McCain had been invited to. Of course why would McCain ever bother to attend a briefing-- who needs facts when the GOP already has it's agenda-the continued skewering of the man who beat them fairly. Oh yeah, they're patriots..

    (Mad Dog, you have your day job and write not one but two blogs--a bit of a slacker huh?)
    Maud

    ReplyDelete
  3. Actually, his other blog is really good. You should check it out Maud - it needs a lot more commentary than it is getting now.

    ReplyDelete