Big Beautiful Blondie Bombies

 

And here Mad Dog thought it was just him.

What Makes a Lady FOXY?

He has some trouble distinguishing among all the blonde ladies with long hair who serve Mr. Trump. They are not exactly doppelgangers, but it can be a little disorienting.

Maybe they are FOXBLONDES.

But then there's that cross thing. 

Mad Dog noticed it but told himself, Naw, just let it pass.

For some reason, those crosses on chains were very common on nurses back in the day. The protagonist of "House of God" commented on it. They turned him on.

There is something in those crosses-- almost a dare, maybe a tease. You know, if a fetching nurse was wearing a cross, it was almost like a wedding ring; it was saying, "I'm not going to bed with you," or something. But then, that was a challenge. That's what was happening in "House of God." Back in the day only women wore crosses on chains. Now, with men wearing bling, there may be more crosses on men, but those non bling, modest little crosses are so...feminine. Or something. 

But what is the message?

MAYBE  the message on the Trump blondes is different: It's a dog whistle to all those Aryan nation types, all the evangelicals that well, you know, America is a Christian nation, as they've been telling us all along.

But then Jon Stewart picked up on it, and Mad Dog was so relieved: It wasn't just some dark psychopathology buried in Mad Dog's mind--other people noticed it.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/NFifXeZdolI

So, it's a thing. 
Maybe. 

GOT COVID? DOGE GOT YOUR PAXLOVID!

 

You heard it here first:  Medicare no longer covers the one drug which actually stops COVID virus from replicating and is highly effective, orally, to rescue patients from the prospect of a respirator: Paxlovid.

No, some things are still available and not removed from reach:  not intravenous bleach, chloroquine or Ivermectin: Mad Dog has not inquired about coverage for those. But then again, unless you are a horse with worms or have a strong death wish, those are no great loss.

Go on Google and you will be told by Google AI Paxlovid is still covered by Medicare Part D (the drug part) but, for once, AI has failed us. 

How does Mad Dog know?

Actual non AI experience in what is now called "actual life," or AL for "actual life" or "alternative life."

Ah, it's New Hampshire, where we live free, and now may have to opt for the second half of that slogan: die.

A New Hampshire chorus of mostly 70 and 80 something women traveled to Scotland and did a number of concerts over the course of June 21-June 28, and about 3 days into the tour, one member tripped and fell, and had to be seen by Scotland's excellent National Health Service, where they found her to be febrile and alertly tested her for COVID, and she was positive. She wore a mask and sat in the back of the bus, and was otherwise isolated/ostracized, but clearly she had been infectious before she was discovered and by the time the chorus of eighty members got home, 45% of the chorus was coughing or simply tested and found to be positive.

Now, this is a pretty robust group of sixty, seventy and eighty year old women, who chose Scotland so they could hike up mountains between performances, but if you are COVID positive, coughing and symptomatic, over 65, Paxlovid is the safest thing to do, and while it has been underused it's well proven to prevent a respirator fate.

So, these women, who communicate avidly electronically, started seeing doctors and getting prescriptions for Paxlovid. Ah, the day is saved!

Or not.

Turns out when they went to the pharmacy to fill the prescriptions every one of them, some who live in Maine, were told the cost is now $700 (for a prescription we can all remember was $50 when Biden was in office.)

Many, not being women of great means, went home without the Paxlovid to face their fate.

So there you have the essence of government efficiency! DOGE has struck again, and this time into the homeland. 

And these are mostly White women, returning from a decidedly not "shit-hole" country with their American passports, so you might think Mr. Trump or Mr. Musk or RFK JR would not have them in their sites.

Of course, neither New Hampshire nor Maine voted for Trump, so there's that--but Maine has a Republican Senator. 

And RFK JR has intimated that if they just ate right and stayed young, none of this would ever have happened.

And really, what could be more efficient than not treating this group? Most of them are on Medicare, some getting Social Security, and some will ultimately need nursing homes, so if these folks die now, in the immortal formulation of Congressman Norman from South Carolina, well, that's a cost saving!

PS: A word on "coverage." 

One woman was told Medicare did "cover" Paxlovid, which costs $2,000, but her "copay" went from $50 last year to $700. So is that really "coverage"? 

There really is no "cost" for any drug now. A doctor who finds a bloated Ixodes tick on him after working in the garden and writes himself a prescription for doxycycline discovers the cost is $1,500. He calls his own doctor who calls in the Rx and the bill is $1.50. So what is the cost of doxycycline or any drug, for that matter?

Seeing What You Want To See

 

South Carolina has given the nation Lindsay Graham, Fort Sumter, the first shots of the Civil War and Congressman Ralph Norman, who appeared on the PBS Newshour to answer questions about the Big Beautiful (for Billionaires) Bill which President Trump wants to sign on July 4th.

Asked about cuts to Medicaid which will shutter many rural clinics, including those in South Carolina, the man who has had briefings at the White House and who has, unlike Mad Dog, presumably read the 940 page bill, said that Medicaid will not, in fact, be cut, except for denying Medicaid payments to illegal aliens who don't deserve to get Medicaid anyway.

When Jeff Bennett, the PBS anchor said that illegal aliens have never been eligible for Medicaid, Congressmen Norman informed the viewing public that they may not have been eligible for Medicaid but they got it any way, and that's what's been bankrupting the program and Mad Dog caught a scent of a long ago stench which found some part of his doggy brain.

Oh, right! The Welfare Queen, that lady Ronald Reagan told us about so long ago, who managed to manipulate the welfare system so expertly that she drove around the ghetto in her Cadillac, wearing a mink coat. No need to say what color she might have been, although there was speculation about whether the Cadillac may have been pink.

And Congressman Norman then swung from talking about the BBBB to a panegyric about how President Trump had stopped illegals from crossing the Mexican border. 

Lisa Murkowski, from Alaska, had held out against the bill until Trump did the art of the deal to exempt Alaska from the Medicaid cuts, so she voted for it, in a patriotic act which could be described as "I got mine, to hell with the rest of the country," or simply this is what pork barrel politics is all about, and besides Iowa gets its way when it comes to adding corn alcohol to gas, which has by now become counterproductive as an environmental move, so it's every state for itself, no matter what we call the UNITED States.

Oh, that swamp done been drained. 

Behind the Congressmen, rushing across the halls, one could see kids and their parents in shorts touring the Capitol on their vacations, just normal tourists, like those fresh faced legions who toured the Capitol on January 6, 2021.

Works in Progress

 

The president of the Hampton Dems, who is nothing if not innovative, challenged the group of 20 or so souls who rallied for the July meeting to try to capture in a phrase and an image what Democrats should be saying to the world.

Give Me My Big Beautiful Billionaire's Bill

Some found this easier than others, and Mad Dog was astonished when some of the quieter, retiring types, who rarely say anything during these meetings, offered up some dazzling thoughts. 

Mad Dog has often despaired of the frumpy, silent, nearly catatonic types who show up for these meetings. 

His compatriot, Olivia, who shows up every time, has always laughed at Mad Dog's grumblings, telling him he simply did not know these folks.

As each offered his or her thoughts, and Mad Dog was left with his jaw on his chest, Olivia shot looks in his direction with a very satisfied, "I told you so!" look on her face.

Sitting among us were likely past winners of the New Yorker caption contest. Mad Dog has long contended that Harvard should not select its class by grades and SAT scores, which tell you how compliant and diligent on the one hand (grades) and on the other hand, who possesses a certain narrow band of competence (SAT's), but they should sit down their 50,000 applicants in exam rooms across the country and present them with a dozen New Yorker cartoon contest problems and that would make the process way easier and would select a much more talented class. For one thing, it would probably eliminate at least half the applicants, who after sitting for an hour or two trying to think of a caption would simply give up and go home and withdraw their applications. 

(The other option would be simply to put all the names in a hat and draw out 2,000 names and be done with it.)

But, Mad Dog digresses. All he is saying is there are all sorts of intelligence, and present in our Dems meeting were at least a dozen folks who possess one very important type.

Don Draper (of Mad Men fame, about Madison Avenue advertising agencies) once said, "Every one thinks what we do is so easy. But, the fact is, very few people can do it."

He was talking about creating an ad campaign.

So Mad Dog limped home with his tail dragging between his legs and tried to do a simple exercise, which is presented above. 

It's a start. Or maybe an end.

But maybe, some talents can be trained and developed.

Baseball pitchers get coached. But they need to have a certain hand/eye coordination, shoulder anatomy, baseline talent.

Hitting a fast ball is certainly something you can learn to do. For that it's not clear you need anything but persistence. Mad Dog has spent years at batting cages. At first he could not hit much of anything. Now, its just a pleasure. 

Cartooning may be somewhere in between.

Trying to Move on from 1948

 

For some time, Mad Dog has been reading the history of the Weimar Republic as if he is reading today's news, but, as has been noted by many, the peace of 1918 was simply a twenty year interregnum until the inevitable war which rolled around once the sides rearmed.

Give 'Em Hell Harry

Now, Mad Dog is immersed in 1948, just 30 years after that maligned treaty, when Truman and his war hawk cabinet decided to go all out on devoting the economy and the focus of national thought on preparing for the final show down with a nuclear Soviet Union. Defense pending in those years was somewhere around 20-30% of the federal government's budget. Today America spends around 13% and the Europeans struggle to get over 2%. 

Reading about Truman is such an echo to today, it is downright eerie: As Peter Kuznik and Oliver Stone recount in their alternative history, "The Untold History of the United States," all the stuff we are dealing with today was put in place in that year, and simply never resolved, despite the fall of the Soviet Union and all the other changes in international relations.

There have been some real shifts: The British Empire really was destroyed by World War Two and the Brits handed over world domination to the United States. They decided to play Greece to our Rome, as Christopher Hitches noted. It's still an empire dominated world: but the empire this time is contained in container ships and military bases, not a local raj system.

Problems simply were never solved.

The Exodus

The founding of Israel is just one of many examples. The United States did not want the Jewish refugees following the Holocaust, just as it did not want to admit them as the Third Reich emerged or during the Holocaust. Hitler remarked dismissively about remarks from some Americans about his treatment of the Jews: "Well, if you feel that way, why didn't you just allow them to immigrate to America? No, you don't want them. Why should we?"

 And after the Holocaust, when Franklin Roosevelt asked the king of Saudi Arabia about allowing Jewish refugees to go to Palestine, the King replied replied, why push them on to an innocent bystander? Put them back to the source of the problem, where those who harmed them can restore them. (He meant Germany.) The tension between the wretched refuge on the teeming shores of Palestine, who settled in and made the desert bloom, and the Arabs who were sheep herding and already there,  has not yet been solved.  There were something on the order of 35,000 Jews and 650,000 Arabs in that general area covered by the British "Balfour Declaration" at the end of World War II and that balance has shifted, owing to Jewish immigration following the war.

As far as Russia goes, first it was communism, which Truman and his team convinced themselves was dedicated to world domination. Of course, Truman and his boys, Curtis Lemay, Forrestal, Acheson, were also bent on world domination, and while America had a monopoly on the atom bomb, they thought it was a done deal. 

But then Truman was shocked to learn his mission accomplished idea was a fraud, and the Russians, three years later had a bomb of their own, and everyone was off to the races to the hydrogen bomb, which just might set the atmosphere on fire. 

And rather than try to negotiate on a more or less equal footing with potential adversaries, the United States decided to simply overwhelm them with spending on defense nobody else could match.

But somehow, that didn't quite control the problems of Russia, or Iran or the Middle East.

We tick off the problems of billionaires running capitalist societies to their own tastes, of struggling work a day folks trying to get by, of under developed nations in Latin America and the inevitable desperate exodus from those nations toward the magnet of wealth in the north, of intolerance of new ideas and the rejection of novel solutions, and you realize we have really made no progress at all in politics, sociology, psychology.

When a man from South Asia runs for mayor of NYC and suggests free bus fare and city sponsored grocery stores cries of the demise of Western Civilization arise. Where will the money come from? Really? In New York City, where only Wall Street capitalists who make more than $10 million a year can afford to buy an apartment you ask where all the money will come from? 

The only real progress we have made has been in science and engineering, particularly bioscience: We were able to develop a vaccine to bring COVID under some semblance of control; we've improved cardiovascular disease outcomes by lowering cholesterol and with angiography and stents; we've controlled some infectious diseases--although our biggest weapon, vaccines, has been thrown under the bus. We made some advances in the treatment of cancer and some lymphomas are actually now curable, as is testicular carcinoma.

Patient, incredibly detailed work on microscopic things has brought us miles of advances in the way life is lived, at least in America. Of course, now biomedical research is being rejected and defunded for ideological reasons. But until now, we did make some real advances.

We have made huge advances in communications and information management which were problems most of us didn't really even know we had in the 1970's. Even science fiction writers didn't imagine the information age. Most science fiction was about wild advances in transportation (space ships, Beam Me Up Scotty), or weapons, or time travel, but how many science fiction writers were writing about artificial intelligence (beyond rudimentary robots) or cell phones or desk top computers or ordering on line goods and services?  

Henry Wallace

Our President in 1948 was simply too small a man, with too small a mind. He did not really like being President: he liked playing poker with his buddies, where he could call people "Niggers" and "kikes," and everyone would laugh. He never lost a minute of sleep about dropping the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. He got good advice from his Commerce Secretary, Henry Wallace--who was FDR's vice president, but who was too liberal to be tolerated by the Dixiecrats and billionaires, so Truman got shoved in to replace him. Truman listened to Wallace, but as soon as he was out of the room, he listened to the next guys in, who wanted capitalism and military spending to rule. They were the testosterone driven guys you see in Dr. Strangelove. Knowing on some level his own limitations, Truman endeavored to listen to the smart boys, but he couldn't figure out who to actually stick with. 

So, then as now, we have small brains in big places and that is democracy. Or we have brain worms. Or fake leaders who look good in costume or who are pretty enough to anchor segments on FOXNEWS.

 

Sometimes in history, the big brained guys give us a polio vaccine, a penicillin, a cholesterol lowering drug and things shift a little. But, for the most part, it's just one caveman pounding another caveman over the head with a bigger club.

What If Derek Chauvin Was Masked?

 

According to Professor Google, there is no federal law requiring police to identify themselves.

Now, syntax is important here. Try googling, "Do police officers have to identify themselves as police officers?"
Mad Dog has tried and failed.  It may well be police officers do not have to flash a badge or a photo ID in many of these United States. Police "in uniform" may be required to show a badge or an ID but plainclothes police apparently do not. That is a separate question from: does a police officer wearing a uniform, impersonating an officer, have to go the next step, to identify himself not just as a police officer, a sworn officer, but to then identify himself as a particular officer with a name and a badge number?

Go try to find that for your own state and town.

One thing which is clear, if a policeman in Hampton asks you to produce identification, you are by law required to do THAT. But it is not at all clear the same obligation weighs on the policeman. He may legally remain anonymous.

How's that for the home of the free and the land of the brave?

The attorney general and every bimbo on FOXNEWS have insisted ICE agents and police everywhere are being stalked and doxxed by "cartels" and masks are necessary for police and agents of every stripe. Of course, nobody has actually thought it necessary to offer evidence this is a real problem and not just some convenient excuse dreamed up to cover nasty behavior.

This means any sadist may impersonate a policeman easily enough, even though claiming to be police when you are not is often illegal--that would only play out later, after you've been stuffed into a van or raped.

In New Hampshire, local sheriff's department and town police have entered into obscure agreements with ICE to apprehend "illegal immigrants." If those police wear masks, baklavas in this open carry state, things may get interesting.

One can well imagine a gaggle of masked agents wearing bullet proof vests, invading the local Indian or Mexican restaurants in Hampton, and sitting there are gun toting citizens who happen to really like the Patek Paneer or the enchiladas, when the storm troopers burst through the door.  Shoot out at the OK corral hardly begins to describe the possibilities.

And what, as a citizen, even unarmed, should Mad Dog do if two men in baclava's jump out of a van and tackle some guy walking his chihuahua on the sidewalk in front of him? Should he act as a Good Samaritan and rush to the rescue? Whose side should he be on? The guys who scream "ICE" ?  Should Mad Dog respond "FBI" and flash his wallet ID obtained for $14 from Amazon?

Wouldn't that be fun? The "ICE agents" in their hoodies and baclava's now facing Mad Dog in his Hawaiian shirt flashing his pocket FBI badge? 

Then we call the Hampton police, who arrive in their N95 masks and try to sort things out.

What's a citizen to do?

Or suppose Mad Dog sees a baklava masked man with is knee on the neck of a man by the road? Who should Mad Dog hit? 

Outside of the COVID pandemic, Mad Dog would have thought the safest thing to assume would be the masked guy is the bad guy, and you should go to the aide of the guy the mask guy is beating.

It's like coming upon a man beating a dog he is holding by a leash with a stick or a club. You may not have much information, but the scene itself asserts itself--ipse race loquitor: The fact speaks for itself. It doesn't matter whether the dog is a local stray or belongs to the man. That dog may be a bad boy. But you don't like seeing a beating.

We hate cruelty to animals.

We reserve judgment about cruelty to people, especially if they happen to be "illegals."

But if Derek Chauvin had been masked, and people in the crowd gathering around him, watching him crush in with his knee on George Floyd's neck, if that milling crowd become unsure if Chauvin was a cop, would George Floyd be alive today?

The Grand Dragon of Alabama Tells NYC Rats to Give More

 

One of Mad Dog's favorite MAGA stars is Alabama's United States Senator Tommy Tuberville--just the name alone, really.

The Hon. Tommy Tub

But here's a hot take from Senator Tuberville's reaction to the victory of Mr. Zohran Mamdani's primary victory in New York City: "These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that's one reason we're $37 trillion in debt. And it's time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes."

White Men Terrified of Being Replaced

Of course, Senator Tuberville's Alabama is one of the most extreme "taker" states, and the good people of Alabama have been sucking at the federal teat way more than even its Red State neighbors. New York, on the other hand is a giver state. Alabama gets way more from the federal government than it pays in, while New York pays in way more than it gets back--so New York City rats are actually carrying Alabama on their backs.

Charlottesville, VA 2017

A quick Google search is all it takes:

• Net Recipient: Alabama consistently ranks among the states receiving significantly more in federal funds than its residents and businesses pay in federal taxes. USAFacts reported a gap of $41 billion.
• High Dependency: It ranks as the sixth-highest state in terms of reliance on federal funding.
• Significant Federal Income: Alabama residents receive a substantial portion of their income from the federal government, exceeding $60 billion, which accounts for 23% of total personal income. 

Contributing Factors:

• Social Safety Net Programs: Alabama's high poverty rates contribute to a greater reliance on federal programs like SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) that provide a safety net for vulnerable populations.
• Smaller Economic Base: Compared to larger, more economically robust states, Alabama tends to contribute less in federal income tax. 

In summary, Alabama's dependence on federal funding, due in part to factors like poverty rates and its economic structure, results in it receiving more federal money than it contributes in taxes, classifying it as a "taker" state in this context. 

So, when it comes to hypocrisy, Senator Tuberville is a grand master, or in terms he might appreciate, he is a grand dragon. 

The suckling pig here is complaining he has to share the teat with other piglings. He thinks he ought to have exclusive rights to the milk! They are just runts anyway! And they aren't even white.

And, of course, what is really causing the trillion dollar debt is Senator Tuberville's MAGA Republican give away to the billionaires, the most recent giveaway being the Great Big Beautiful for Billionaires Bill soon to have Mr. Trump's great big beautiful (illegible) signature.

You can't make this stuff up.

Nathan Bedford Forrest: Early KKK MAGA man

Heather Cox Richardson may be right: The South did, eventually, win the Civil War. And not satisfied with it's victory in that one, it is trying to start another.

Good Ol' Boy at his Murder Trial

Masked Goons or Simply Frightened Cops?

 
"The right of people to be secure in their persons,

houses,

papers, and

effects

against unreasonable searches and seizures, 

shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause

supported by Oath or affirmation,

and particularly describing the place to be searched,

and the persons or things to be seized."

--Fourth Amendment (ratified 1791)

United States Constitution

So, that was written in the 18th century, but the anger which prompted that amendment arose from ordinary citizens being mistreated, accosted on the streets and in their homes--there were no automobiles then--and Americans wanted to be sure they were not bothered, harassed, treated with arrogant disregard, made powerless by the soldiers or police with guns, as they lived their lives in America.

If you wore a red uniform, carried the seal of the King, then you could do whatever you liked under the British and Americans wanted to be sure they would not have to put up with such stuff in their new country.

One thing which makes a seizure unreasonable, it ought to be clear is if the person or persons arresting you cover their faces, travel in unmarked cars and show no identification beyond a metal badge anyone can purchase on line. 

ICE agents, and now their collaborators, the local police or sheriffs are hiding behind baklavas, wearing no identifiable uniforms and using unmarked vans--is that not, ipso facto, unreasonable?

Oh, Blondie Bondi protests: The officers are being "doxxed" and their families are receiving threats from those mysterious, invisible drug cartels! So our police and ICE agents can become like those Star War automatons in white armor, robots seizing anyone walking, working or traveling while Brown and spiriting them away to prisons in El Salvador or Sudan or Gitmo, because, you know, they are possibly illegal aliens, which means,  you know, they almost certainly have raped and murdered white women here in the USA.

The question I have is this: If these guys are so afraid they are wearing masks and unwilling to identify themselves: Should we not ask them whether maybe they should go into another line of work? I mean, did Elliot Ness or Wyatt Earp cower behind masks? And don't try to tell me Dodge City was any less dangerous than some (possibly imaginary) cartels.

And then there is the Sixth Amendment: 

"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed...and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusations; to be confronted with the witnesses against him...and to have Assistance of Counsel for his defense."

If you are wrestled into a van in Maryland and dumped in a prison in El Salvador or in Vermont or New Orleans, then ipso facto, your 6th amendment rights have been violated.

If your masked abductors do not have to reveal themselves, you do not even know who is making the accusation: again violating the 6th amendment.

You are certainly not "safe in your person."

And those rights are not just for citizens but for anyone walking down the street in the USA.

Of course, the Trumplings have tried to evade those inconvenient rights by whisking people off to Gitmo, saying the Constitution does not apply in that Black Site, but, that of course does not explain how you can violate all those rights in Maryland or New Hampshire and all those protections melt away as soon as your plane lands in Gitmo.

Mad Dog is no lawyer, but he can read.

And Professor Google is a help. 

And then there is that old sticky principle "Habeas Corpus" which means the government has to justify the arrest of anyone.

Article One gives the one exception: the government can suspend habeas corpus in the case of Rebellion or Invasion as the public safety may require it."

So here is where the Trumplings try a sleight of hand: By calling illegal immigrants an "invasion" they can say, oh we have an exception here. Except, invasion means Mexican troops pouring across the border with Santa Anna waving his sword. If you want to go all Scalia and originalist, the meaning of invasion is not simply a convenient metaphor, it is an actual invasion by an identifiable army.

Unless, of course, you are Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Roberts and maybe Coney-Barrett, because then, anything goes, if Trump says so.

It is here where watching the movie, "Judgment At Nuremberg" is helpful. 

Based on the trial of German judges who carried out the laws of the Third Reich as Hitler and Goebbels and Himmler commanded, the American prosecutors are, at first knocked off guard.  German judges on trial approved of sterilization of "undesirables" who included Communists or anyone thought to be mentally deficient, and the German defense counsel reads the opinion of Oliver Wendell Holmes in the Bell case, in which he concludes sterilization of the woman Bell was justifiable as "three generations of imbeciles are enough." What the German defense attorney is saying of course is Americans were models for the German race theorists--with the eugenics movement of the Boston/Harvard era in the 1920's providing a "scientific" basis for excluding undesirable races from America and preventing some undesirables already here from reproducing.  Teddy Roosevelt described allowing immigration of populations from undesirable places like Italy, Africa and Central America as "race suicide." 

Now, we are drifting back to those days which gave us the "Chinese exclusion act" and when Henry James describes a Jew walking across Boston common in great detail with repugnance, describing his black frock, his sideburns and that description pops up nearly verbatim in "Mein Kampf."

So, America has been in some very nasty places before. We swung back toward valuing diversity and tolerance, and then the pendulum may have swung a little too far, as campuses made it a requirement for hiring that professors swear a loyalty oath to DEI.

But here we are, with that pendulum swung back to the anti immigrant thing where people are described as insects and sub-humans and no law protects them. 

It Can't Happen Here

 

The United States of America has been a gonzo, berserk nation from its inception, an unlikely an amalgam as ever pullulated up from planet earth, with silk stockinged bewigged delegates from the slave states of South Carolina and Virginia (Edward Rutledge, Thomas Jefferson)  joining dowdy, disgruntled New Englanders (John Adams) along with Benjamin Franklin, to establish a half slave nation which claimed to be a beacon of liberty, and which did, indeed inspire others (the French most immediately) to realize that even if there is a God in Heaven, He likely did not actually anoint a mere mortal to be a king. 

This America, Man!

Looking at developments in their own countries and in the world Sinclair Lewis and George Orwell (Eric Arthur Blair) wrote parables which proved to be both prescient and illuminating. Lewis's novel and then stage play depicted the rise of a Hitler/Huey Long like figure who played on American prejudices and gullibility to seize power.

Orwell once said he'd like his tombstone to read, "Damn you all to Hell! I told you this would happen!"

Mad Dog has thought fascism would not take hold outside the South, where it has been in place since the 18th century, simply because the rest of the country was too self absorbed, complacent and ignorant to actually bother embracing the mind control necessary to a fascist state.

But now, we see masked goon squads, trundling people off into unmarked vans in broad daylight. So, Mad Dog asks, how are we any different from Russia, Venezuela, Brazil or El Salvador? 

No Baklava. Home Address is Public

When asked why sheriffs from Rockingham County who now assist ICE agents in abducting people from their work sites or automobiles, the New Hampshire's finest replied that police are now subject to "doxing" and they and their families are at risk from "the cartels," and so the police are afraid and must be allowed to beat, subdue and even kill their prey for fear...fear of what? 

We Hang Together or We Hang Separately

Mad Dog asked what doxing is and was told it meant publishing on social media the telephone numbers, home addresses and other identifiers publicly.

Which reminded Mad Dog of the conversation he once had with the CEO of Portsmouth Hospital, in Portsmouth New Hampshire. Mad Dog said he was glad to finally meet her because he could not find her name on any of the printed media, on the hospital website or even at the reception desk in the hospital and when he asked where her office was, the man behind the counter asked, "What do you need to know for?"  

If You Can Find Me

She explained she did not want anyone to know who she was--outside of the hospital staff--because she feared getting hate mail and who knows what else? This was fifteen years ago, well before doxxing or shootings of CEO's of health insurance companies. 

I stared at her thinking: If you are THAT afraid, maybe you should not BE the CEO. After all, isn't that why we pay CEO's the big bucks, because they are willing to take the responsibility? (Of course, all this was long before that United Health Care CEO got shot.) But really, if you are going to be a CEO, or a cop, shouldn't that entail a certain risk? What's next, soldiers and sailors and marines wearing masks?

Eventually, the CEO was fired for not meeting budgets and the CEO functions transferred to the Hospital Corporation of America in Nashville, Tennessee, where presumably the managers in power would be safe.

No Hiding From His Enemies

Taken to it's logical extreme, this might mean our next candidates for Congress, for the Presidency may simply identify themselves by numbers or some sort of social media tag, "MAGAMAN" or "Super Sleuth" or "Ultra Kool Dude."  And police walking a beat? Forget about it. Police will cruise around in airconditioned Hum Vees totally garbed up in body armor and equipped with robots to pluck likely looking suspects off the streets.

Remember when police in New York did "stop and frisk" for any suspicious looking (i.e. dark skinned) young males walking down the street, claiming that technique had made crime drop? Then, when the actual data was examined it turned out crime had dropped years before stop and frisk and after stop and frisk was outlawed, crime dropped further.

Buy Your Badge on Line

So, yes, it CAN happen here.

Already has. 

Where's His Baklava?

We are just too complacent and preoccupied with getting the kids to day care and camp and with watching the Red Sox and the girls displaying on the Sea Wall to notice.

The Devil Went Down to Georgia and Senator Jon Ossoff Smites Him

 

There's a lot of well ground angst about the failure of Democrats to rise up to do battle with Republican thugs like Jim Jordan, about how the Republicans have tigers in Congress where Democrats send only house cats.

Jamie Raskin, Alan Schiff cross foils with Republicans, but they usually only leave a dueling scar across the odd Republican cheek. 

Jon Ossoff lancinates the heart.

Consider his evisceration of the latest Trump toadie to sit before a Senate Committee.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epqdjIIkqnk

It's a lovely bit of predation.

His quarry is Russell Vought, of the OMB. Senator Ossoff ticks through a list of civil servants who had been summarily fired in mass, then rehired when it was discovered these workers actually service and protect our nuclear missiles, or our vaccine supplies and asks if the very act of quickly rehiring those essential workers did not speak for itself, ipse race loquitor ("The fact speaks for itself"), demonstrating such willy nilly actions were a mistake which even the perpetrators had to quickly admit and correct. Oh, my bad.

Ode to Chattel Slavery

Well, I don't know it was a mistake. I wasn't the one firing those particular people, is Vought's answer. But surely, even if you weren't the one who made that particular mistake, you can look at the act and agree firing nuclear missile caretakers and then rehiring them the next day suggests a mistake, actually an avalanche of mistakes were made? 

No, Vought says. I don't know that.

And then Vought does the Trump Tango: It was all Biden's fault.

When Ossoff shifts the question to firing half the staff at the CDC, which is in his home state of Georgia, Vought stammers that the CDC showed itself to be a failure during COVID, implying firing half the CDC staff was justified, but then he slips on to saying the CDC's failures were all Biden's fault. 

And Ossoff replies, "You are not here representing the Biden Administration. You represent the Trump administration. I don't want to hear about Biden."

It's the old Trump Tango, shuffle, well you think we're bad, what about Biden?!?

Poor Vought: He's stuck with just a few dance steps. He cannot possibly admit to a mistake because that means someone in the Trump administration may have been wrong about something. So all he can do is pretend he doesn't know enough to know when someone un-does  what he's just done, that is a tacit acknowledgement of, "Oh, my bad."

Georgia Justice

But this is not about Vought, who like so many Trump toadies is not really worth the time it takes to flay them.

This is about Ossoff, who is combative enough, adroit enough to be a Democrat with some street cred and good vibes. The man can throw a punch. He's not got the baggage of AOC. He's not got the cadence or maybe not the charisma of Bernie Sanders.

Slaying Dragons: Ossoff

But he's definitely got something. If it's not charisma, I don't know what to call it. 

Mad Dog found he could not resist contributing to his campaign. 

He's a keeper.