Sunday, April 20, 2025

Alito: The Monster Behind the Mask

 


Reading Justice Samuel Alito's dissent in the case of Trumpist deportations of Venezuelans to that same gulag in El Salvador where the Maryland man abducted by Trump's masked ICE agents was dumped does not take long.

A Reliable Vote for Despotism

Justice Alito found that there was no justification for the Court to prevent further illegal abductions because:

1. The United States lacks jurisdiction: i.e. it's not our problem any more. There's lots of historical precedent for this idea of course: the United States sent a boatload of Jews back to Europe because they did not have paperwork signed by the local Gestapo attesting to their good character, and once those boats left American ports, well, there was no way the American government could help them--not our jurisdiction.

2. Stopping deportations means the government has to be given time to argue why its current program should continue, but in the meantime the government should not be thwarted from the kidnapping program they've rushed into. If Justice Alito had been asked to stop Adolph Eichmann from loading all those Jews into cattle cars in Holland, France, Poland and shipping them off to the camps in Germany, he would presumably have found Mr. Eichmann should be given time to prepare his case, but in the meantime keep those railroad cars rolling.

3. There is not enough evidence the men in question are really being harmed: Just because a man is thrown into a gulag in Central America is no reason to suppose he's not having a good time.

The essence of Alito's objection is: "What's the rush?" 


American Justice 


My favorite sentence in Justice Alito's decision is the last:

"I refused to join the Court's order because we had no good reason to think that, under the circumstances, issuing an order at midnight was necessary or appropriate. Both the Executive and the Judiciary have an obligation to follow the law."

We can count ourselves fortunate Justice Alito is not a trauma surgeon--just because a felon stabs some poor passerby on the street, and the victim is rushed to the emergency room does not mean the surgeon should be roused from sleep at midnight to attend to the bleeding. The insurance card has to be examined, and the insurance company phoned, and if the hour is late, well, we'll just have to wait until tomorrow morning, so we do not violate the prescribed procedures.

And now, Justice Alito can go back to bed.  Heaven forbid the system should be pushed to act with urgency!

When I heard two justices had voted to keep these criminal governmental acts going, sending victims to  El Salvador, imagine the look of surprise on my face to learn which two justices those might be!  

Could it be Justice Alito and, wait for it, Justice Thomas?

American Justice


Which is not to say that Justices Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett and Roberts were sure things when it came to voting to correct an illegal act--kidnapping, abducting and imprisoning. In roughly descending order of Trumpism, those four are only usually reliable in finding that whatever President Trump wants to do is just fine--he can get money in any way he pleases; he can do whatever he wants as long as he says it's part of his job as President, and he can never be tried in any court for any crime--even murdering someone on Fifth Avenue. The only way to depose the President is for the Senate to convict him after the House of Representatives impeaches him.

Not Going to Save Democracy


So, as long as the American public votes Republican, there is no controlling Mr. Trump, and abductions, imprisonment, extortion and bribery are just fine with the American voter and with the Supreme Court of the United States. 



13 comments:

  1. Senator from Maryland (Van Hollen) was asked by a reporter if he had in his meeting with the deported Salvadoran national whether he was a member of any foreign gangs (MS-13). The Senator responded he didn't think the question was relevant. Really? Is that Senator at all concerned about protecting his law-abiding constituency?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mad Dog really shows some glaring ignorance of history here. He fixation on Nazis has led him to cite the notorious Eichmann. Eichmann, as fugitive, of course was kidnapped by Israel and deported, without due process, to stand trial in Israel for his crimes and executed. That whole action was extrajudicial. I suppose mad dog would complain about how Eichman was entitled to due process before extradition and that any extrajudicial extradition (via kidnapping) is horrible and morally wrong. Did you support Israel's action in taking him? Or can we infer another case of Liberal hypocrisy?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Actually, that is an interesting case to raise.
    So, if "extrajudicial" action is ok for Eichmann, why is it not ok for this Maryland/El Salvadoran man?
    Fair enough question.
    In the case of Eichmann, we had one country, Argentina, which harbored all the Nazis who could get there and escape retribution for their murderous behavior in Europe and another country, Israel, determined to bring those despicable thugs to justice. Having no diplomatic options, no extradition treaties and faced with the determined efforts of the Argentines to provide a safe haven, the Israelis said, "International law, Argentine law be damned, these people have committed crimes against humanity, and at the very least against Jews whose family members now live in Israel, so we will act."
    That was a political act. One might call it an act of war. A declared war, for that matter.
    I applaud their efforts. Spit in the eye of those accomplices who are beyond the reach of the rest of humanity and go drag that rabid animal back to Israel. If you have the power to do it, do it and see what the Argentines want to do about it.
    I'm fine with that. One country making another country pay.
    I am a little less easy about going after Osama Bin Laden, as he had never been tried in an American Court, far as I know, but I don't know enough about his case.
    The answer here, however, is in the fact that far from an espionage operation in a foreign country, the kidnapping of this man (accused of no crime--beyond his undocumented status) was perpetrated within the United States by a lawless section of the US government within the country where the US Constitution is supposed to reign supreme.
    Eichmann's kidnapping may be said to have been a political act, as much as a moral act: the Israelis saying, you think you have the power, but we have the power, which is what politics is. So we will humiliate your power and assert our own.
    In the case of the peaceable man living in Maryland, having harmed nobody, harming nobody, a member of no lawless group, the government of our own country ignored the law, violated the letter and the sprit of our Constitution (The Fourth Amendment: unreasonable search and seizure. "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized."
    Pretty clear.
    So, if this guy can be whisked away by hooded ICE agents in the dead of night without any due process at all, then they can do that to anyone they decide they do not like much, and none of us are safe. Now we've got a police state and a Gestapo operating without restraint. We have gone full bore Third Reich.
    I don't feel unsafe because they kidnapped Eichmann.
    I do think anyone who did what Eichmann did should not feel safe, and in this country, ex concentration camp guards had warrants issued for their arrest, sometimes decades after the end of WWII and they were deported, tried and convicted, all with due process.
    Due Process within our borders by our own government.
    Mad Dog

    ReplyDelete
  4. Perhaps you should educate yourself that Al it’s revert nation on earth makes illegal entry a crime with a potential prison term. This gentleman entered the u tied states illegally. The senator from Maryland refused to even question him on his gang affiliation. Here is we lust of criminal penalties for illegal entry from every nation on earth.

    https://maint.loc.gov/law/help/illegal-entry/chart.php

    ReplyDelete
  5. Please execute typos in the above. Thanks

    ReplyDelete
  6. Mad Dog,
    Of all the idiot conceits ever uttered— Alito’s what’s the rush, it’s the middle of the night is a 10 out of 10. It’s right up there with “let them eat cake”….He and Thomas-silly men with a serious job…
    Maud

    ReplyDelete
  7. "To have a senator from Maryland who didn't even acknowledge, or barely acknowledged my daughter and the brutal death she endured, leaving her five children without a mother and now a grandbaby without a grandmother so he can use my taxpayer money to fly to El Salvador to bring back someone that's not even an American citizen?" Patty Morin said. Van Hollen is also a glaring Anti-Semite. He is a friend to HAMAS and a friend to illegal criminals. Mad Dog why do you think the Senator refused to ask the citizen of El-Salvador whether he was a gang member? Do you want to venture a guess why?

    ReplyDelete
  8. "I am a little less easy about going after Osama Bin Laden, as he had never been tried in an American Court, far as I know, but I don't know enough about his case." Mad Dog I think your sentence here reveals a lot to your readers. By comparison, I think the comedian Larry David at least was all in on the Bin Laden mission.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I celebrated along with everyone else at Bin Laden's death--but somewhere back of mind was the movie "Parallax View" and the knowledge what I knew, what we all knew about Bin Laden, was provided by the press, the media, the government and not in a court of law with rules of evidence.
    Not that we always have that luxury. We could not try Hitler before bombing him.
    As for Van Hollen as a "glaring Anti-Semite," apparently anyone who disagrees with you is an Anti-Semite. That's a low bar. I don't think he is, nor is Bernie Sanders, nor AOC nor are my friends, Jewish (including Israeli Jews) and Gentile who are appalled by Netanyahu and the Israeli right which has launched a war of extinction which is whatever else it is, astonishingly stupid.
    Mad Dog

    ReplyDelete
  10. Mad Dog,
    Once again couldn’t state the case any better than you just have. The cries of anti semitism anytime the horror in Gaza is brought up is grossly inaccurate and stale. Why does Anon presume to speak for everyone in the Jewish community given that his narrow views certainly aren’t shared by everyone in that community. You nailed it when you added that in addition to being immoral, the Israeli behavior in Gaza is stupid. They have squandered all the sympathy and goodwill that much of the world had towards Israel following October 7 and turned it into increasingly universal disgust. The scenes of starving women and children grasping for rations are not staged and won’t soon be forgotten. There are plenty of members of the Jewish community who are horrified by this…
    Maud

    ReplyDelete
  11. Yes. To suggest that Israel is waging a war "of extinction" makes you and your friends glaring Anti-Semites. The Israelis are defending their nation against a genocidal enemy and trying to liberate the people of Gaza from the tyranny of terrorists. You and your leftist friends who find fault with that have no understanding of history, war or sympathy for the people of Gaza who have suffered under Hamas. You mocked Trump for suggesting the evacuation of Gaza but leftists have no plan for removing Hamas. Every civilian death in Gaza is only the result of HAMAS refusal to surrender. You have now revealed yourself to be a leftist anti-Semite of the highest order. You are fixated on Transsexuals and DEI because these threaten you 1950's elitist Ivy League order. Trump is pulling back that the curtain on the damage that leftists have done and revealing whether it is minorities, Blacks and Hispanics or Jews or those at the lower end of the social economic order how they are brutalized, exploited and degraded by leftist elitism. Thank you for making that picture even clearer especially for Jewish victims who were savaged, raped and murdered by Hamas and live under the Iranian genocidal proxy threat. Thank you on behalf the American Marines murdered by Hezbollah or beaten to death on the tarmac of terrorist seized planes. Thank you on behalf of the three thousand Americans murdered on September 11th by the man you are concerned about who got his "due process" at the end of an American special forces soldier. You have revealed yourself to your readers.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous:
    Feel better now?
    Must be something to realize you are the only virtuous man on earth.
    Mad Dog

    ReplyDelete
  13. Doesn’t take much to know and understand that Hamas and Nazis are the same and those who embrace Hamas and denounce the Jewish state war to eradicate that evil are living in Denial of reality or naive to the their own Jew hatred

    ReplyDelete