Treason: What Is It?

When Bennedict Arnold, a general in the American army contacted the British army, gave the enemy information about Washington's military plans and then joined the British army as a general leading forces against Washington and the colonials, that was clearly treason.

Arnold

When Robert E. Lee, an officer in the United States Army resigned his commission to fight for the Confederacy, to destroy the United States, that clearly was treason.

Righteous Treason

But if Trump uses the stuff Russian hacks produce to frame Hillary Clinton, to suggest she has some criminal or unsavory doings buried in her emails, is that treason because the source of all this was Russia or Wikileaks?


Thinking about the use of foreign powers to foster success in American elections, Richard Nixon becomes a case study.


Of course, we can never know whether or exactly how Nixon contacted the leader of South Vietnam, Nguyen Thieu, in the fall of 1968 to convince him President Johnson was going to sell out South Vietnam in the Paris Peace talks, and to promise that if Nixon won, Thieu would get a better deal. But there is a paper trail and while some dispute it, it looks pretty convincing.


1968 was a pretty eventful year: Martin Luther King was murdered in March; Bobby Kennedy was murdered a few months later. Eugene McCarthy challenged Lyndon Johnson in the New Hampshire Democratic primary and did not beat LBJ but showed well enough to shock everyone: Johnson got something like 49%, McCarthy 43% and George Wallace was eventually in the mix in later primaries. The Democratic Convention was a horror show and blood flowed in the streets of Chicago as demonstrators on the outside were bludgeoned by a police riot using what Senator Abraham Ribicoff described from the convention podium as "Gestapo tactics" while Mayor Daley screamed "Fuck you!"

Ms. Chennault

As the election neared, LBJ finally agreed to stop bombing Vietnam and the North and the Viet Cong then agreed to meet South Vietnam and America at the table. Nixon reached Thieu through a woman intermediary, Anna Chennault,  and Thieu refused to join the talks and the pre election hope of a settlement of the war collapsed.


Nixon was elected, and the war ground on for another 7 years with 20,000 more American deaths and untold Vietnamese deaths.


Whatever Trump may have done, nobody is accusing him of sacrificing the lives of American soldiers so he can attain office, but the idea of manipulating public opinion by intrigue with foreign players does sound familiar.

Max Head Room Doctors

The background story provided for the Max Headroom character in his original appearance comes from a dystopian near-future dominated by television and large corporations. The AI of Max Headroom was shown to have been created from the memories of crusading journalist Edison Carter. The character's name came from the last thing Carter saw during a vehicular accident that put him into a coma: a traffic warning sign marked "MAX. HEADROOM: 2.3 M" (an overhead clearance of 2.3 meters) suspended across a car park entrance.

Last night I attended  Journal Club at the Portsmouth Regional Hospital, where doctors assemble after hours to discuss the month's New England Journal of Medicine articles, an effort to keep up to date.

As usual, before we got down to the articles, there was a little banter and gossip and the big news was that the virtual neurologist had gone on the fritz and the neurologist at the table was roped into seeing a stroke victim in the Emergency Department.


Turns out this was all just a small window into a much bigger story:  Apparently, the Hospital Corporation of America (HCA) has concluded that its efforts to support office practices of neurologists, pulmonologists, cardiologists, primary care is a losing proposition, financially. These practices have always been what hospitals depend on to "feed" the hospital patients, who need the MRI's., emergency care, laboratory studies, hospital beds, ICU beds, maternity beds. But the practices often just barely break even and, the speculation is, HCA realized they can do away with all that burden and simply try to profit from the hospital.

They got the hospital declared a Level Three (or some level) "trauma center," to focus on where the money is.
But, to do this, you need to create a "Stroke Center" which means that any patient who comes to the Emergency Department with a stroke has to be seen within an hour and evaluated by a neurologist to see if he needs a "clot busting" drug run into his carotid arteries to break up a clot which is preventing brain tissue downstream from getting oxygen carrying blood.


The problem is, if the stroke victim has a Hemorrhagic stroke, one cause not by clot obstructing blood flow but by bleeding into the substance of the brain, giving a "clot buster" makes the blood flood a large part of the brain, making the stroke much worse.

So a neurologist has to see the patient.
The problem is, HCA fired most of its neurologists so how do you get the neurologist to the bedside in the emergency department?


Enter the mobile monitor/computer on a rolling cart and the neurologist appears courtesy of a Skype like technology. He may be in Nebraska, and he "interviews" the patient, while a nurse does the physical exam.


Now, of all physical exams, the neurological physical exam is among the most difficult and requires the most experience and touch, but, never fear, a nurse can be trained up, apparently.


At this point, my mouth is agape and I know I'm being played. I started laughing.
"Oh, for a moment there, you had me going! I thought you were serious."
Actually, they were serious. There is such a thing.


And that day the system went down on the "Stroke Center."
That got me thinking about what can and cannot be done off site.

For nearly a decade CT and MRI scans have been done in American emergency rooms and read by a doctor sitting at a computer in India. That horrifies American patients but doctors have long ago accepted this. After all, American radiologists, seeking an easier life, demanded the images be sent to their homes so they didn't have to get out of bed to drive over to the hospital and it's all on computer, so why not?


In a sense, American doctors have brought this concept and its consequences on themselves.


But neurologists were among the last bastion of real live clinicians, that neurological exam being an art and a hands on thing. Like plumbers and electricians, you can't just do it virtually from afar. Until now.


I guess surgeons are safe, for now at least. We haven't go to the point where you are wheeled into the operating room, lifted off the gurney and placed on the operating table by a robot and have your appendix removed by a robot.

But just you wait.
It's all so much more efficient and profitable.
Who wants to be the Luddite in medical care?


We have reached the point of the Max Headroom physician. He is not an actual human being at the bedside. He exists only on the monitor screen.


That's your Trauma Center and Stroke Center you drove past your local community hospital to reach. 
Welcome to for profit medicine, America. It's all yours now.

Trump Derangement Syndrome

Rand Paul is not a guy I would vote for, but his diagnosis of CNN, PBS, and a host of other networks is manifestly correct. 


He dismisses the whole Trump/Russian collusion story as "Trump Derangement Syndrome," which is motivated by an underlying desire to see Trump driven from office the way Nixon was, by investigations, charges of criminality. So a self important fool like former intelligence chief Brennan says Trump's behavior in Helsinki was "treason" gets big play, Cuomo, Camerota are quoting it, when in fact, Trump isn't smart enough to commit treason if he wanted to.

Of course the Russians wanted to see Trump win, just as a variety of conservative Americans did, and they fomented false stories on social media, just as a whole host of Trumpees did. As Rand says, every nation spies on other nations; every nation tries to influence the outcome of elections in other countries in a way which will benefit their own countries.


No country has tried harder to do this than the United States, in many Asian, South American and African nations, and likely in Europe on occasion.

It's the height of hypocrisy for government officials here to get all sanctimonious about "Russian interference" in American elections, when America has interposed itself in elections and governance in Iraq, Afghanistan, Egypt, Brazil, the Philippines, Cuba, Nicaragua, Viet Nam, Chile, Venezuela, Indonesia, and these are only the countries somebody has bothered to write a book or an article about.


Americans in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Florida and the entire Confederacy voted for Trump not because Russia fooled them but because Trump fooled them, or maybe not. Maybe he was just giving them the racist red meat they hungered for.

Watching Chris Cuomo, Alisyn Camerota, Judy Woodruff, Mika Brezynski, Mark Shields carry on about smoking guns and illegal behavior, obstruction of justice because they suffer from the delusion this can be another Watergate leaves Mad Dog frothing.


Trump told you he fired Comey because he could. No such thing as obstruction of justice when he came to Comey. Comey should have been fired for politicizing the FBI and he was.


Trump has done nothing but what he said he would do when he was campaigning.
We want him out. We got to beat him on building the wall, vilifying Hispanic immigrants, killing Obamacare, trying to reverse Roe v Wade with Supreme Court appointments.  If we cannot beat him on the issues, we got no right to be in power.

Trump Balloon: Where's that American Entrepreurnial Spirit?

The Tea Party had its yellow Don't Tread on Me flag.

What the Democratic Party, Indivisible, Resist and all the other folks who see Trump as they do in London need is a Trump balloon.

So, I went on line to see where I can order my version of that London Trump balloon, and nada, none, empty!  I want several, each in different sizes.

Amazon, don't fail me now!
Esty, where are you when I need you.

God save the Republic! Someone out there needs to get those Chinese factories churning out Trump balloons.

Or, better yet, factories in West Virginia!

Of course, Mad Dog productions is hoping for a hand puppet version.

But really, people, here is a need crying out to be met.

Something's Not Right With That Boy

As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.

H. L. Mencken

Today, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, the man who sits in the same building where Abraham Lincoln once sat, tweeted:


Thank you to all of my great supporters, really big progress being made. Other countries wanting to fix crazy trade deals. Economy is ROARING. Supreme Court pick getting GREAT REVIEWS. New Poll says Trump, at over 90%, is the most popular Republican in history of the Party. Wow!




Wow, indeed.

You have to give him credit for his sunny disposition, except of course, when he sucks his thumb and pouts.

But really, when you read that tweet to his supporters, what do they say? Do they not see a problem here?

Meritocracy, Affirmative Action, Harvard, America, Trump: Ugh

If ever there was a topic which screams "political correctness," affirmative action has got to be it.

How well I remember when one of my classmates in college asked our English professor if we could set aside the discussion of Sheridan's "School for Scandal" to discuss instead a proposal to insure 12% of the college's next freshman class would be Black students. That would be 77 of the 640 members of the class.

I thought then, and I do now, that finding 77 Black students should not be a problem. Our Dean of Admissions, greeting us on the first day told us he could have filled the freshman class with "qualified applicants" from New York City alone.  Typically the college got 5000 applications for those 640 slots and accepted 1,000. The 360 extras went to Harvard, Yale and Princeton. They had applied to my college as a "safety school."

Today, the argument persists that one of the best way to address the problem of systematic discrimination against Black people is to place them in elite colleges, because, you know, all you have to do is get into one of those colleges and your ticket has been punched; you will be handed a lucrative job at the best banks, corporations, or you will move on to one of the best law schools or medical schools. Once you had that name "Harvard" or really any Ivy League school next to yours, it didn't matter if your name was Keesha, or Latisha or Keyshawn, you could start looking for a mansion in any upscale neighborhood and shopping for your Mercedes.

There were a lot of underlying assumptions to that argument, among them, that simply being present in the college would assure later success, that the students selected were no better than those rejected and anyone could be placed on that campus and go on to live happily ever after. When you put it that way, advocates said, "Of course, we don't believe that. But these students of color ought to be given the chance to compete."

Choosing the best musicians for the New York City philharmonic, the candidates are placed behind a screen and the judges listen to the music they make. Nothing could be a better mechanism for choosing for merit than that.  But there is no screen like that for college admission. Even if you could devise one, advocates for affirmative action would say the game is rigged: Black students haven't had the advantages of years of private lessons, getting toted from one teacher to the next by "Tiger Moms."

But if you are really interested in a meritocracy, the disadvantages endured by Black kids should not matter. All that should matter is how well they can play that violin at the time you need to choose the best violinist.

But no, the argument goes, that college admission can be the make up mechanism for all those violin lessons never received over the prior 12 years.

Well, if you want to remedy that disadvantage, the reply comes, you have to start 12 years earlier, unless you don't really care about merit so much as about giving some lucky students a break, at least for a few years.

The other outcome, not desired by anyone, is that if there is any advantage to having that Harvard name on your application, if the other name on that application is Keyshawn or Latisha, the person reading the application says, "Oh, she may be Harvard, but she's Black, so we know what Harvard means in her case."

Trying to solve the disparities in opportunity, income inequality and class by admitting Blacks to elite colleges is trying to solve a maze of complex problems with a simple one step solution:  As if you had an automobile run off the road, sitting in a ditch on its top, wheels spinning, frame  bent, windows blown out and you go down and put on a set of new tires.

It's the old problem of process vs results. If the Civil Rights movement is about process, equal opportunity, right to vote, right to use public accommodation, that's as it should be. But when you look to make the measure of success results, well then, you've got another problem entirely.

Headline Dissonance

While we focus on the bestial practice of separating children from their mothers at the border, we fail to aude alteram partem. 
Decent, well meaning liberals have fallen into the trap inadvertently set for them by Trump and Co.

Or, more likely, liberals like "Crying Chuck Schumer" have instinctively tried to show how compassionate, feeling, warm and fuzzy they are by focusing on the children.

Available for your next garden party

But in the bars I hang in, you hear, "Hey, what do you think happens right here in New Hampshire, when a mother gets jailed for shop lifting? You do the crime; you do the time."

Of, course there is a difference in sympathies here and a misunderstanding of the "crime" of crossing the border undocumented.

What we really need now is an Al Franken in the Senate, someone who could ridicule Trump and Sessions effectively, as Pia Guerra has done.

Pia Guerra

But, no, all the Dems rushed to expel Franken because he was accused of sexual harassment, mugging for a photo he clearly knew was being taken, while placing his hand on the flak jacket of a reporter at breast level. Oh, for shame!

Democrats are still into shame, where Trump laughs at shame, and that is a kind of strength the Democrats cannot wrap their minds around.

Pia Guerra

Our problem with Central Americans from 3 desperately dysfunctional Central American countries (whose total population adds up to 21 million) is different from what the Europeans face. 

The Europeans have absorbed a million refugees and some, but not most, of these are men who reject basic European values, like allowing women to walk outside without a male guardian, allowing women to vote, allowing anyone to dance, allowing anyone to imbibe alcohol. These are not the rapists Trumps sees in Hispanic gate crashers; these men are far more dangerous because they arrive seeking refuge and then, in a graft v host reaction, they reject the very nations which offered them refuge.

So they grope blonde German women in the public square in Cologne Christmas eve.
Groping any unaccompanied woman in the market in an Arabic country is fair play. Not so much in Germany, Sweden or Britain.

Our refugees are different. Much as Trump, Louie Gomhert and Kris Kobach want to depict them as MS-13 rapists, they are not.

Trump's West Side Story

For the most part, the Hispanic families cross our Southern border share certain characteristics: The family unit is strong. They work hard at low paying jobs Americans tend to eschew. Far more of the men are skilled carpenters than MS-13 types.  Many real estate developers, construction company magnates say their Hispanic employees are the best workers they have, as a group, if you want to generalize. 

Democrats should begin every discussion with the statement: Nobody is suggesting it would be a good thing for the United States to admit 130 million Chinese and 130 immigrants from India and 21 million from Central America tomorrow.  We wouldn't be helping either them or us if we did. But what we are saying is with a population of 300 million, we can admit, and actually need to admit (given our falling birth rates), immigrants in a controlled way.  Immigrants are not an infestation simply because they are not as blond as Ivanka.  Think of the Spanish speaking folks you know. Do they look more like MS-13 or Lin Manuel? 

Adolf's demon seeds