Thursday, October 2, 2025

The Threat From Within

 He orchestrates a conclave of his most senior and powerful generals and admirals, knowing that power, or at least the kind of power he seeks, flows from the muzzle of a gun.





There have been some intimations that the military leadership may not be entirely loyal to the man, but to another idea of leadership and power.

He touches on the threat of encroachment from without, from invasion across borders, but that is not where he focuses his attention.

It is the threat from within which concerns him most. The nation has been infested, is rife with disloyal, self serving, money hungry hordes who are not true, clean, real countrymen. They threaten to bring down the country from within.

He explains there are some places where his support is very strong and these places will be rewarded, but where his support has been sparse, he will invade and he will use the armed forces to pacify these areas of resistance, disloyalty and perfidy.

He exhorts his generals to focus on aiming their weapons at the threat inside, in cities which are festering with this unwholesome, repugnant element.

He has cowed, coerced and reshaped the judiciary, which is now not a counter measure to his power, but an ally in his consolidation of power.

On the street, people are arrested for their appearance, or because of overheard conversations, and troops storm into workplaces, public spaces and even homes and are hauled away and often families cannot even ascertain where they have been sent.

Longstanding processes are dismissed as weak and needless impediments to the vital work which demands immediate action for the safety of the nation.

He speaks of returning the nation to the dominance and rightful exalted status among nations and all humanity it deserves and once enjoyed.

Public officials are dismissed because they are perceived as antagonistic or disloyal to him personally, and to oppose him is to oppose the nation, the brotherhood of those who share the will toward greatness.

Words like "unprecedented" and "not normal" are used so often they are no longer even noticed.

He is, the press and media explain, something so different and new we have only old words to describe a new phenomenon.

But, they are wrong. He is not something new. 

He is something returned from the past, playing, openly and unabashed, by an old playbook, published and sold widely, a copy in every home. It has simply been unread and forgotten, but it is not new. 



It is a zombie, returned from the past which is no longer the past, but simply an echo coming back around.










Wednesday, October 1, 2025

Following Court Order? A Firing Offense

 

Just in case you missed it: a U.S. Attorney in California was fired by President Trump because she notified a lawless ICE official a court order forbid him from arresting people because they looked Hispanic.

She was following a court order to the letter. 

Beckwith: The Temerity of Obeying the Law


Michele Beckwith told Gregory Bonvino, head of the Border Patrol's El Centro region, to stop arresting people for walking while Brown, and liceity split, she got fired directly by the Oval Office.

Just Look At This Toadie 


Mr. Bonvino apparently responded that the Supreme Court had already ruled arresting people for speaking Spanish, looking Mexican or working in jobs frequented by immigrants is perfectly alright.

So, this is where we are: the 3 branches of government has collapsed into one: The Executive branch, or some would say the Royal branch--"Le droit, c'est moi," meaning "I am the state," which is Louis XIV. After XIV came Louis XV, who said, "Apres moi, le deluge," after me the deluge. And he was surely correct about that.




Have youtube and AI conquered death?

 Mad Dog ponders this question:  If you die, but your deep fake image shows up on youtube saying stuff you would have said about something that happened after your death, in your voice, with your phrasing and distinguishable cadence, phrasing and beliefs, are you actually alive somewhere in cyberspace?



You have now entered the Twilight Zone, dear Mad Dog readers.

You all know how I loved Christopher Hitchens and was bereft when he died.

But has he?

Died?

There are now several choice visits from the seance room, author (s) unknown.  (Much speculation, but thus far not even Professor Google knows.)

How often have I said, "I wish we could ask Pop about that?  Or, Mom would have just launched over that." So, one thing about death, is you cannot have conversations about things which happened after someone's death with that dead person.

But here, it feels like we are...having a conversation...or at least hearing from that individual from beyond.

Creepy? 

Perhaps.

Worth engaging? 

Absolutely.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGdJQuooPF4